Literature DB >> 20598419

Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else?

Monika Intaite1, Mika Koivisto, Osvaldas Ruksenas, Antti Revonsuo.   

Abstract

Ambiguous (or bistable) figures are visual stimuli that have two mutually exclusive perceptual interpretations that spontaneously alternate with each other. Perceptual reversals, as compared with non-reversals, typically elicit a negative difference called reversal negativity (RN), peaking around 250 ms from stimulus onset. The cognitive interpretation of RN remains unclear: it may reflect either bottom-up processes, attentional processes that select between the alternative views of the stimulus, or it may reflect the change in the contents of subjective awareness. In the present study, event-related potentials in response to endogenous unilateral and bilateral reversals of two Necker lattices were compared with exogenously induced reversals of unambiguous lattices. The RN neither resembled the attention-related N2pc response, nor did it correlate with the content of subjective visual awareness. Thus, we conclude that RN is a non-attentional ERP correlate of the changes in the perceptual configuration of the presented object. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20598419     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  9 in total

1.  Synchronous and opposite roles of the parietal and prefrontal cortices in bistable perception: a double-coil TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Marine Vernet; Anna-Katharine Brem; Faranak Farzan; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Insights from intermittent binocular rivalry and EEG.

Authors:  Michael A Pitts; Juliane Britz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Ambiguous figures - what happens in the brain when perception changes but not the stimulus.

Authors:  Jürgen Kornmeier; Michael Bach
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Auditory event-related potentials associated with perceptual reversals of bistable pitch motion.

Authors:  Gray D Davidson; Michael A Pitts
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Pre-coincidence brain activity predicts the perceptual outcome of streaming/bouncing motion display.

Authors:  Song Zhao; Yajie Wang; Lina Jia; Chengzhi Feng; Yu Liao; Wenfeng Feng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Assessing Field Dependence-Independence Cognitive Abilities Through EEG-Based Bistable Perception Processing.

Authors:  Cristina Farmaki; Vangelis Sakkalis; Frank Loesche; Efi A Nisiforou
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  What happens in the brain of meditators when perception changes but not the stimulus?

Authors:  Jürgen Kornmeier; Evelyn Friedel; Lukas Hecker; Stefan Schmidt; Marc Wittmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Bistable perception: neural bases and usefulness in psychological research.

Authors:  Guillermo Andrés Rodríguez-Martínez; Henry Castillo-Parra
Journal:  Int J Psychol Res (Medellin)       Date:  2018 Jul-Dec

Review 9.  Bi-Stable Perception: Self-Coordinating Brain Regions to Make-Up the Mind.

Authors:  Christ Devia; Miguel Concha-Miranda; Eugenio Rodríguez
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.