Literature DB >> 20598241

Ethnic issues in endoscopy.

Brooks D Cash, Subhas Banerjee, Michelle A Anderson, Tamir Ben-Menachem, G Anton Decker, Robert D Fanelli, Norio Fukami, Steven O Ikenberry, Rajeev Jain, Terry L Jue, Khalid M Khad, Mary L Krinsky, Phyllis M Malpas, John T Maple, Ravi Sharaf, Jason A Dominitz.   

Abstract

This is one of a series of statements discussing the use of GI endoscopy in common clinical situations. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) prepared this text. In preparing this guideline, a search of the medical literature was performed by using PubMed. Additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of the identified articles and from recommendations of expert consultants. When few or no data exist from well-designed prospective trials, emphasis is placed on results from large series and reports from recognized experts. Guidelines for appropriate use of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus at the time the guidelines are drafted. Further controlled clinical studies may be needed to clarify aspects of this guideline. This guideline may be revised as necessary to account for changes in technology, new data, or other aspects of clinical practice. The recommendations are based on reviewed studies and are graded on the quality of the supporting evidence (Table 1). The strength of individual recommendations is based on both the aggregate evidence quality and an assessment of the anticipated benefits and harms. Weaker recommendations are indicated by phrases such as "we suggest," whereas stronger recommendations are typically stated as "we recommend." This guideline is intended to be an educational device to provide information that may assist endoscopists in providing care to patients. This guideline is not a rule and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment. Clinical decisions in any particular case involve a complex analysis of the patient's condition and available courses of action. Therefore, clinical considerations may lead an endoscopist to take a course of action that varies from this guideline. Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20598241     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  11 in total

1.  Can a gastric cancer risk survey identify high-risk patients for endoscopic screening? A pilot study.

Authors:  Haejin In; Marisa Langdon-Embry; Lauren Gordon; Clyde B Schechter; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Philip E Castle; M Margaret Kemeny; Bruce D Rapkin
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 2.  Colorectal cancer disparities: issues, controversies and solutions.

Authors:  Venkata S Tammana; Adeyinka O Laiyemo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Occurrence of Distal Colorectal Neoplasia Among Whites and Blacks Following Negative Flexible Sigmoidoscopy: An Analysis of PLCO Trial.

Authors:  Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Chyke Doubeni; Paul F Pinsky; V Paul Doria-Rose; Robert Bresalier; Thomas Hickey; Thomas Riley; Tim R Church; Joel Weissfeld; Robert E Schoen; Pamela M Marcus; Philip C Prorok
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  What Constitutes Evidence? Colorectal Cancer Screening and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Barron H Lerner; Graham Curtiss-Rowlands
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Short- and long-term risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence among whites and blacks.

Authors:  Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Chyke Doubeni; Hassan Brim; Hassan Ashktorab; Robert E Schoen; Samir Gupta; Aline Charabaty; Elaine Lanza; Duane T Smoot; Elizabeth Platz; Amanda J Cross
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  African Americans should be screened at an earlier age for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Paquette; Jun Ying; Shimul A Shah; Daniel E Abbott; Shuk-Mei Ho
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Upper Endoscopy up to 3 Years Prior to a Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer Is Associated With Lower Stage of Disease in a USA Multiethnic Urban Population, a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Shailja C Shah; Chiaki Nakata; Alexandros D Polydorides; Richard M Peek; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2019-04-26

8.  The Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of microRNA in Colorectal Cancer - a Comprehensive review.

Authors:  Haggi Mazeh; Ido Mizrahi; Nadia Ilyayev; David Halle; Bjoern Brücher; Anton Bilchik; Mladjan Protic; Martin Daumer; Alexander Stojadinovic; Avital Itzhak; Aviram Nissan
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 9.  Is screening and surveillance for early detection of gastric cancer needed in Korean Americans?

Authors:  Gwang Ha Kim; Sung Jo Bang; Alexander R Ende; Joo Ha Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 2.884

10.  Global perspective on colonoscopy use for colorectal cancer screening: A multi-country survey of practicing colonoscopists.

Authors:  Céline Audibert; Anna Perlaky; Daniel Glass
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.