Literature DB >> 2059818

Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and venography in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.

D C Mitchell1, M S Grasty, W S Stebbings, I B Nockler, M D Lewars, R A Levison, R F Wood.   

Abstract

Sixty-five patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in 68 limbs were entered consecutively into a study to compare venography with duplex ultrasonography scanning. Both tests were performed on 64 limbs, venography being contraindicated in four. Overall, duplex scanning correctly identified 86 per cent of DVTs diagnosed on venography and correctly excluded 80 per cent with negative venograms. Nearly all errors arose in the diagnosis of calf DVT. In the femoral vein duplex scanning had a specificity of 100 per cent and a sensitivity of 95 per cent. In addition, duplex scanning provided data on the limb not undergoing venography. Of 55 limbs that underwent bilateral duplex scanning, five had thrombus in the femoropopliteal segment and a negative contralateral venogram. In addition, three Baker's cysts were diagnosed. Duplex scanning can be used in patients in whom venography is contraindicated and may also provide information about the contralateral limb. We regard femoropopliteal duplex scanning as sufficiently accurate that treatment can be initiated on the basis of the scan. Duplex scanning should replace venography as the standard method of diagnosing femoropopliteal DVT; radiographic studies should now be required only when the scan result is in doubt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2059818     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800780528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  6 in total

Review 1.  Suspected deep vein thrombosis: a management algorithm for the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  S Nawaz; P Chan; S Ireland
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-11

2.  Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Roman Jaeschke; Scott M Stevens; Steven Goodacre; Philip S Wells; Matthew D Stevenson; Clive Kearon; Holger J Schunemann; Mark Crowther; Stephen G Pauker; Regina Makdissi; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Vitamin K antagonists versus low-molecular-weight heparin for the long term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Alina Andras; Adriano Sala Tenna; Marlene Stewart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-24

Review 4.  Combined use of rapid D-dimer testing and estimation of clinical probability in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: systematic review.

Authors:  Tonya L Fancher; Richard H White; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-21

5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Steve Goodacre; Fiona Sampson; Steve Thomas; Edwin van Beek; Alex Sutton
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Impact of thromboprophylaxis across the US acute care setting.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Frederick A Anderson; Sophie K Rushton-Smith; Alexander T Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.