OBJECTIVE: There is evidence that gag contributes to protease inhibitor susceptibility in treatment-experienced patients. Moreover, protease inhibitor resistance-associated mutations can arise in gag in the absence of protease mutations in vitro. We wished to assess the contribution of full-length Gag to protease inhibitor susceptibility in viruses unexposed to protease inhibitors, in particular from the most common HIV-1 subtypes, namely subtype A and C. DESIGN: We compared the drug resistance profiles of subtype A and C cognate gag-protease (from viruses not previously exposed to protease inhibitor) to protease combined with a generic subtype B gag as in routine phenotypic testing. METHODS: We amplified gag-protease sequences from plasma-derived virus or molecular clones, and used a single cycle transfection-based drug resistance assay to compare the fold changes in the concentration of drug required to inhibit 50% of viral replication of these viruses to a generic subtype B. We made a series of chimeras to explore phenotypes further. RESULTS: In some cases, use of protease sequences without the cognate gag overestimated susceptibility to protease inhibitors, in particular to lopinavir. We provide evidence that gag sequences from wild-type viruses can contribute as much as 14-fold reduction in susceptibility to lopinavir, and that cognate protease can balance this by partially restoring susceptibility. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate the importance of considering protease inhibitor susceptibility in the context of full-length gag, particularly with respect to the range of HIV-1 subtypes circulating worldwide.
OBJECTIVE: There is evidence that gag contributes to protease inhibitor susceptibility in treatment-experienced patients. Moreover, protease inhibitor resistance-associated mutations can arise in gag in the absence of protease mutations in vitro. We wished to assess the contribution of full-length Gag to protease inhibitor susceptibility in viruses unexposed to protease inhibitors, in particular from the most common HIV-1 subtypes, namely subtype A and C. DESIGN: We compared the drug resistance profiles of subtype A and C cognate gag-protease (from viruses not previously exposed to protease inhibitor) to protease combined with a generic subtype B gag as in routine phenotypic testing. METHODS: We amplified gag-protease sequences from plasma-derived virus or molecular clones, and used a single cycle transfection-based drug resistance assay to compare the fold changes in the concentration of drug required to inhibit 50% of viral replication of these viruses to a generic subtype B. We made a series of chimeras to explore phenotypes further. RESULTS: In some cases, use of protease sequences without the cognate gag overestimated susceptibility to protease inhibitors, in particular to lopinavir. We provide evidence that gag sequences from wild-type viruses can contribute as much as 14-fold reduction in susceptibility to lopinavir, and that cognate protease can balance this by partially restoring susceptibility. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate the importance of considering protease inhibitor susceptibility in the context of full-length gag, particularly with respect to the range of HIV-1 subtypes circulating worldwide.
Authors: F Gao; N Vidal; Y Li; S A Trask; Y Chen; L G Kostrikis; D D Ho; J Kim; M D Oh; K Choe; M Salminen; D L Robertson; G M Shaw; B H Hahn; M Peeters Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2001-05-20 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Dale J Kempf; Jeffrey D Isaacson; Martin S King; Scott C Brun; Jacquelyn Sylte; Bruce Richards; Barry Bernstein; Richard Rode; Eugene Sun Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2002-09
Authors: Sharon A Riddler; Richard Haubrich; A Gregory DiRienzo; Lynne Peeples; William G Powderly; Karin L Klingman; Kevin W Garren; Tania George; James F Rooney; Barbara Brizz; Umesh G Lalloo; Robert L Murphy; Susan Swindells; Diane Havlir; John W Mellors Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Chris M Parry; Madhavi Kolli; Richard E Myers; Patricia A Cane; Celia Schiffer; Deenan Pillay Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2010-12-13 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: S Alireza Rabi; Gregory M Laird; Christine M Durand; Sarah Laskey; Liang Shan; Justin R Bailey; Stanley Chioma; Richard D Moore; Robert F Siliciano Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Mohammad Hassam; Adriaan E Basson; Dennis C Liotta; Lynn Morris; Willem A L van Otterlo; Stephen C Pelly Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Maria C Puertas; Maria J Buzón; Mònica Ballestero; Peter Van Den Eede; Bonaventura Clotet; Julia G Prado; Javier Martinez-Picado Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Adriaan E Basson; Soo-Yon Rhee; Chris M Parry; Ziad El-Khatib; Salome Charalambous; Tulio De Oliveira; Deenan Pillay; Christopher Hoffmann; David Katzenstein; Robert W Shafer; Lynn Morris Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 5.191