OBJECTIVE: Increasing data support a role for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) in controlling HIV-1 infection. We recently isolated a naturally occurring dimeric form of the anti-HIV-1 antibody 2G12 and found it to be significantly more potent than 2G12 monomer in neutralizing primary virus strains. However, given the unusual structure of dimeric 2G12 with two Fc regions, it was not clear whether 2G12 dimer could bind to the CD16 Fc receptor on ADCC effector cells or trigger ADCC. Here we compared the in-vitro ADCC activities of 2G12 monomer and dimer and investigated the effects of including ADCC-enhancing mutations in both forms of 2G12. METHODS: An in-vitro ADCC assay using target cells stably expressing gp160 was developed to evaluate the activities of 2G12 monomer and dimer with and without ADCC-enhancing mutations that increase the CD16-binding affinity of the 2G12 Fc region. RESULTS: Both 2G12 monomer and 2G12 dimer elicited ADCC, although the dimer showed increased potency [lower half-maximal concentration (EC(50))] in triggering ADCC, thus confirming its ability to bind CD16 and trigger ADCC. The ADCC-enhancing mutations improved the ADCC activity of 2G12 monomer more than 2G12 dimer such that their EC(50) values were nearly equal. However, no increase in nonspecific ADCC activity was observed using 2G12 IgGs with these mutations. CONCLUSION: Given the likelihood that ADCC plays a role in protecting against initial infection and/or controlling chronic infection, these data suggest 2G12 dimers and/or addition of ADCC-enhancing mutations could augment the prophylactic and/or therapeutic potential of 2G12.
OBJECTIVE: Increasing data support a role for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) in controlling HIV-1 infection. We recently isolated a naturally occurring dimeric form of the anti-HIV-1 antibody 2G12 and found it to be significantly more potent than 2G12 monomer in neutralizing primary virus strains. However, given the unusual structure of dimeric 2G12 with two Fc regions, it was not clear whether 2G12 dimer could bind to the CD16 Fc receptor on ADCC effector cells or trigger ADCC. Here we compared the in-vitro ADCC activities of 2G12 monomer and dimer and investigated the effects of including ADCC-enhancing mutations in both forms of 2G12. METHODS: An in-vitro ADCC assay using target cells stably expressing gp160 was developed to evaluate the activities of 2G12 monomer and dimer with and without ADCC-enhancing mutations that increase the CD16-binding affinity of the 2G12 Fc region. RESULTS: Both 2G12 monomer and 2G12 dimer elicited ADCC, although the dimer showed increased potency [lower half-maximal concentration (EC(50))] in triggering ADCC, thus confirming its ability to bind CD16 and trigger ADCC. The ADCC-enhancing mutations improved the ADCC activity of 2G12 monomer more than 2G12 dimer such that their EC(50) values were nearly equal. However, no increase in nonspecific ADCC activity was observed using 2G12 IgGs with these mutations. CONCLUSION: Given the likelihood that ADCC plays a role in protecting against initial infection and/or controlling chronic infection, these data suggest 2G12 dimers and/or addition of ADCC-enhancing mutations could augment the prophylactic and/or therapeutic potential of 2G12.
Authors: Christopher J Miller; Qingsheng Li; Kristina Abel; Eun-Young Kim; Zhong-Min Ma; Stephen Wietgrefe; Lisa La Franco-Scheuch; Lara Compton; Lijie Duan; Marta Dykhuizen Shore; Mary Zupancic; Marc Busch; John Carlis; Steven Wolinsky; Steven Wolinksy; Ashley T Haase Journal: J Virol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Greg A Lazar; Wei Dang; Sher Karki; Omid Vafa; Judy S Peng; Linus Hyun; Cheryl Chan; Helen S Chung; Araz Eivazi; Sean C Yoder; Jost Vielmetter; David F Carmichael; Robert J Hayes; Bassil I Dahiyat Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-03-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Amapola Manrique; Peter Rusert; Beda Joos; Marek Fischer; Herbert Kuster; Christine Leemann; Barbara Niederöst; Rainer Weber; Gabriela Stiegler; Hermann Katinger; Huldrych F Günthard; Alexandra Trkola Journal: J Virol Date: 2007-06-13 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: P W Parren; P A Marx; A J Hessell; A Luckay; J Harouse; C Cheng-Mayer; J P Moore; D R Burton Journal: J Virol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Marlén M I Aasa-Chapman; Anna Hayman; Philippa Newton; David Cornforth; Ian Williams; Persephone Borrow; Peter Balfe; Aine McKnight Journal: AIDS Date: 2004-02-20 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Daniel A Calarese; Christopher N Scanlan; Michael B Zwick; Songpon Deechongkit; Yusuke Mimura; Renate Kunert; Ping Zhu; Mark R Wormald; Robyn L Stanfield; Kenneth H Roux; Jeffery W Kelly; Pauline M Rudd; Raymond A Dwek; Hermann Katinger; Dennis R Burton; Ian A Wilson Journal: Science Date: 2003-06-27 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Yunji Wu; Anthony P West; Helen J Kim; Matthew E Thornton; Andrew B Ward; Pamela J Bjorkman Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Brian Moldt; Mami Shibata-Koyama; Eva G Rakasz; Niccole Schultz; Yutaka Kanda; D Cameron Dunlop; Samantha L Finstad; Chenggang Jin; Gary Landucci; Michael D Alpert; Anne-Sophie Dugast; Paul W H I Parren; Falk Nimmerjahn; David T Evans; Galit Alter; Donald N Forthal; Jörn E Schmitz; Shigeru Iida; Pascal Poignard; David I Watkins; Ann J Hessell; Dennis R Burton Journal: J Virol Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Charles D Murin; Jean-Philippe Julien; Devin Sok; Robyn L Stanfield; Reza Khayat; Albert Cupo; John P Moore; Dennis R Burton; Ian A Wilson; Andrew B Ward Journal: J Virol Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Benjamin von Bredow; Juan F Arias; Lisa N Heyer; Brian Moldt; Khoa Le; James E Robinson; Susan Zolla-Pazner; Dennis R Burton; David T Evans Journal: J Virol Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 5.103