Literature DB >> 20595281

Prolonged serologically active clinically quiescent systemic lupus erythematosus: frequency and outcome.

Amanda J Steiman1, Dafna D Gladman, Dominique Ibañez, Murray B Urowitz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Some patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are clinically quiescent despite persistent serologic activity. We determined the frequency of serologically active clinically quiescent (SACQ) SLE and its outcomes in prospectively followed patients with SLE.
METHODS: Patients with SLE followed between July 1970 and April 2008 with visits < or = 18 months apart were identified. SACQ was defined as a > or = 2-year sustained period without clinical activity with persistent serologic activity (increased anti-dsDNA and/or hypocomplementemia), during which antimalarials but neither steroids nor immunosuppressives were permissible. Characteristics of patients with an SACQ period and its features were analyzed. To determine flare predictors, anti-dsDNA and complement levels in SACQ patients who experienced flare were compared to levels in those who did not. Descriptive statistics were used; comparisons were made using t tests and chi-squared tests.
RESULTS: Of the patients studied, 56/924 (6.1%) were SACQ. They differed significantly from the non-SACQ SLE population only in the presenting SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (7.34 vs 10.1 in non-SACQ), and frequency of steroid use (33.9% vs 60.8% in non-SACQ) and immunosuppressive use (3.6% vs 19.4% in non-SACQ) at first visit. Median SACQ period was 158 weeks. Thirty-three (58.9%) patients who were SACQ experienced flare (at median 155 weeks), 6 (10.7%) became clinically and serologically quiescent (236 weeks), and 17 continued to be SACQ (159 weeks). Common flare manifestations were arthritis, mucous membrane involvement, and sterile pyuria. Fluctuations in anti-dsDNA or complement levels did not predict flare.
CONCLUSION: Fifty-nine percent of SACQ patients experienced flare, but after a median of 3 years. Fluctuations in complement and anti-dsDNA levels did not predict flare, thus treatment decisions in these patients must rely upon close clinical observation. Alternative predictive biomarkers warrant study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20595281     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.100007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  25 in total

Review 1.  The need to define treatment goals for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Kate Franklyn; Alberta Hoi; Mandana Nikpour; Eric F Morand
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Factors associated with remission in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: new insights into a desirable state.

Authors:  Jorge Romo-Tena; Roberto Reyna-de la Garza; Isaac Bartnicki-Navarrete; Jorge Alcocer-Varela; Diana Gómez-Martin
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Biomarkers for kidney involvement in pediatric lupus.

Authors:  Beatrice Goilav; Chaim Putterman; Tamar B Rubinstein
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 4.  Epigenetics and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Unmet Needs.

Authors:  Pier Luigi Meroni; Alessandra Emiliana Penatti
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 5.  2022 Systemic lupus erythematosus remission in clinical practice. Message for Polish rheumatologists.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pawlak-Buś; Piotr Leszczyński
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 6.  Tailored treatment strategies and future directions in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Dionysis Nikolopoulos; Lampros Fotis; Ourania Gioti; Antonis Fanouriakis
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.580

Review 7.  Clinical disease activity and flare in SLE: Current concepts and novel biomarkers.

Authors:  Aikaterini Thanou; Eldon Jupe; Mohan Purushothaman; Timothy B Niewold; Melissa E Munroe
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 7.094

8.  Flare, persistently active disease, and serologically active clinically quiescent disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: a 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Fabrizio Conti; Fulvia Ceccarelli; Carlo Perricone; Francesca Miranda; Simona Truglia; Laura Massaro; Viviana Antonella Pacucci; Virginia Conti; Izabella Bartosiewicz; Francesca Romana Spinelli; Cristiano Alessandri; Guido Valesini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Autoantigen Repertoire and the Microbial RNP World.

Authors:  Sandra G Williams; Sandra L Wolin
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 11.951

Review 10.  What Causes Lupus Flares?

Authors:  David Fernandez; Kyriakos A Kirou
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.