OBJECT: Despite advances in the knowledge of tumor biology, the outcome of glioblastoma tumors remains poor. The design of many molecularly targeted therapies in glioblastoma has focused on inhibiting molecular abnormalities present in tumor cells compared with normal tissue rather than patient outcome-associated factors. As an alternative approach, the present study identified genes associated with shorter survival as potential therapeutic targets. It was hypothesized that inhibition of a molecular target associated with poor outcome would impact glioblastoma cell proliferation. METHODS: The present study correlated patient survival data with tumor gene expression profiling and gene ontology analysis. Genes associated with shorter survival were identified and one of these was selected for therapeutic targeting in an in vitro system. Glioblastoma cell growth suppression was measured by H(3)-thymidine uptake, colony formation, and flow cytometry. RESULTS: The gene expression microarray and ontology analysis revealed that genes involved in mitotic processes, including AURKA, were associated with poor prognosis in glioblastoma. Inhibition of AURKA suppressed glioblastoma cell growth. Moreover, inhibition of AURKA was synergistic with radiation in glioblastoma cells at high radiation doses. CONCLUSIONS: Relative expression of AURKA may be of prognostic value and warrants further investigation with larger, prospective studies. Pharmacological inhibition of AURKA is a potentially promising therapy for glioblastoma.
OBJECT: Despite advances in the knowledge of tumor biology, the outcome of glioblastoma tumors remains poor. The design of many molecularly targeted therapies in glioblastoma has focused on inhibiting molecular abnormalities present in tumor cells compared with normal tissue rather than patient outcome-associated factors. As an alternative approach, the present study identified genes associated with shorter survival as potential therapeutic targets. It was hypothesized that inhibition of a molecular target associated with poor outcome would impact glioblastoma cell proliferation. METHODS: The present study correlated patient survival data with tumor gene expression profiling and gene ontology analysis. Genes associated with shorter survival were identified and one of these was selected for therapeutic targeting in an in vitro system. Glioblastoma cell growth suppression was measured by H(3)-thymidine uptake, colony formation, and flow cytometry. RESULTS: The gene expression microarray and ontology analysis revealed that genes involved in mitotic processes, including AURKA, were associated with poor prognosis in glioblastoma. Inhibition of AURKA suppressed glioblastoma cell growth. Moreover, inhibition of AURKA was synergistic with radiation in glioblastoma cells at high radiation doses. CONCLUSIONS: Relative expression of AURKA may be of prognostic value and warrants further investigation with larger, prospective studies. Pharmacological inhibition of AURKA is a potentially promising therapy for glioblastoma.
Authors: Kleiton Silva Borges; Angel Maurício Castro-Gamero; Daniel Antunes Moreno; Vanessa da Silva Silveira; Maria Sol Brassesco; Rosane Gomes de Paula Queiroz; Harley Francisco de Oliveira; Carlos Gilberto Carlotti; Carlos Alberto Scrideli; Luiz Gonzaga Tone Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Norman L Lehman; James P O'Donnell; Lisa J Whiteley; Robert T Stapp; Trang D Lehman; Kathleen M Roszka; Lonni R Schultz; Caitlin J Williams; Tom Mikkelsen; Stephen L Brown; Jeffrey A Ecsedy; Laila M Poisson Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Gabriela D A Guardia; Bruna R Correa; Patricia Rosa Araujo; Mei Qiao; Suzanne Burns; Luiz O F Penalva; Pedro A F Galante Journal: NPJ Genom Med Date: 2020-01-16 Impact factor: 8.617
Authors: Roberto Jose Diaz; Brian Golbourn; Maryam Shekarforoush; Christian A Smith; James T Rutka Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Sujatha Venkataraman; Irina Alimova; Tiffany Tello; Peter S Harris; Jeffrey A Knipstein; Andrew M Donson; Nicholas K Foreman; Arthur K Liu; Rajeev Vibhakar Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2012-01-15 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Mari Kogiso; Lin Qi; Frank K Braun; Sarah G Injac; Linna Zhang; Yuchen Du; Huiyuan Zhang; Frank Y Lin; Sibo Zhao; Holly Lindsay; Jack M Su; Patricia A Baxter; Adekunle M Adesina; Debra Liao; Mark G Qian; Stacey Berg; Jodi A Muscal; Xiao-Nan Li Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: C Kurokawa; H Geekiyanage; C Allen; I Iankov; M Schroeder; B Carlson; K Bakken; J Sarkaria; J A Ecsedy; A D'Assoro; B Friday; E Galanis Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-11-05 Impact factor: 4.130