Literature DB >> 20593828

Variability in the distribution of phenolic compounds in milled fractions of chickpea and horse gram: evaluation of their antioxidant properties.

Yadahally N Sreerama1, Vadakkoot B Sashikala, Vishwas M Pratape.   

Abstract

Seed coat, cotyledon and embryonic axe fractions of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum L.) were evaluated for their phenolic composition in relation to antioxidant activities. Compositional analysis of phenolics by HPLC revealed a wide variation in the distribution of flavonols, isoflavones, phenolic acids and anthocyanins among these legume fractions. Although cotyledon fractions of both the legumes were rich in phenolic acids, the concentrations of flavonols such as quercetin, kaempferol, and myricetin were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than the embryonic axe and seed coat fractions. Ferulic, chlorogenic, caffeic, and vanillic acids were the principal phenolic acids found in cotyledons. The most striking difference was the predominance of isoflavones in embryonic axe fractions. Although the isoflavone genistein was detected in all three fractions of chickpea, it was present exclusively in the embryonic axe fraction of horse gram at levels greater than daidzein. Furthermore, cyanidin, petunidin, and delphinidin were detected in seed coat and embryonic axe fractions but not in cotyledons. In addition to these three anthocyanins, malvidin was found only in the horse gram seed coat fraction. Seed coat fractions having higher total phenolic indexes were found to be the most active 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavengers (IC(50) 13.1 to 18.6 microg/mL) followed by embryonic axe and cotyledon fractions (IC(50) 15.4 to 34.2 microg/mL). Hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) scavenging capacities of cotyledons, embryonic axe and seed coats were 12.3, 34.1 and 78.6% for chickpea and 15.1, 56.8 and 92.6% for horse gram, respectively. The multiple antioxidant activity of horse gram and chickpea fractions was evident, as they also possessed reducing power and ferrous ion-chelating potency. These results contributed to the understanding of the relationships between major phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of legumes and provided useful information for effective utilization of legume-milled fractions as functional food ingredients for promoting health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20593828     DOI: 10.1021/jf101335r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  13 in total

1.  Phenolic profile and antioxidant capacity of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) as affected by a dehydration process.

Authors:  Yolanda Aguilera; Montserrat Dueñas; Isabel Estrella; Teresa Hernández; Vanesa Benitez; Rosa María Esteban; María A Martín-Cabrejas
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.921

2.  Phenolic profiles and their contribution to the antioxidant activity of selected chickpea genotypes from Mexico and ICRISAT collections.

Authors:  Maria F Quintero-Soto; Ana G Saracho-Peña; Jeanett Chavez-Ontiveros; Jose A Garzon-Tiznado; Karen V Pineda-Hidalgo; Francisco Delgado-Vargas; Jose A Lopez-Valenzuela
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 3.  Horse gram- an underutilized nutraceutical pulse crop: a review.

Authors:  Saroj Kumar Prasad; Manoj Kumar Singh
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.701

Review 4.  Orphan legumes: harnessing their potential for food, nutritional and health security through genetic approaches.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Chongtham; Elangbam Lamalakshmi Devi; Kajal Samantara; Jeshima Khan Yasin; Shabir Hussain Wani; Soumya Mukherjee; Ali Razzaq; Ingudam Bhupenchandra; Aanandi Lal Jat; Laishram Kanta Singh; Amit Kumar
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Biochemical changes in phenols, flavonoids, tannins, vitamin E, β-carotene and antioxidant activity during soaking of three white sorghum varieties.

Authors:  Abd El-Moneim M R Afify; Hossam S El-Beltagi; Samiha M Abd El-Salam; Azza A Omran
Journal:  Asian Pac J Trop Biomed       Date:  2012-03

6.  Hepatoprotective Effect and Chemical Assessment of a Selected Egyptian Chickpea Cultivar.

Authors:  Reham H Mekky; Mostafa R Fayed; Mohamed R El-Gindi; Azza R Abdel-Monem; María Del Mar Contreras; Antonio Segura-Carretero; Essam Abdel-Sattar
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Caesalpinia Crista Linn. Induces Protection against DNA and Membrane Damage.

Authors:  R Sunil Kumar; Ramesh Balenahalli Narasingappa; Chandrashekhar G Joshi; Talakatta K Girish; Ananda Danagoudar
Journal:  Pharmacogn Mag       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 1.085

8.  Evaluation of Cassia tora Linn. against Oxidative Stress-induced DNA and Cell Membrane Damage.

Authors:  R Sunil Kumar; Ramesh Balenahalli Narasingappa; Chandrashekar G Joshi; Talakatta K Girish; Ummiti Js Prasada Rao; Ananda Danagoudar
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

9.  A Combined Comparative Transcriptomic, Metabolomic, and Anatomical Analyses of Two Key Domestication Traits: Pod Dehiscence and Seed Dormancy in Pea (Pisum sp.).

Authors:  Iveta Hradilová; Oldřich Trněný; Markéta Válková; Monika Cechová; Anna Janská; Lenka Prokešová; Khan Aamir; Nicolas Krezdorn; Björn Rotter; Peter Winter; Rajeev K Varshney; Aleš Soukup; Petr Bednář; Pavel Hanáček; Petr Smýkal
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Proximate composition, phytochemicals, minerals and antioxidant activities of Vigna mungo L.seed coat.

Authors:  Pushpam Marie Arockianathan; Kumar Rajalakshmi; Priya Nagappan
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2019-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.