| Literature DB >> 20593287 |
A Gutzeit1, Ch L Zollikofer, M Dettling-Pizzolato, N Graf, J Largiadèr, C A Binkert.
Abstract
Venous stenting has been shown to effectively treat iliofemoral venous obstruction with good short- and mid-term results. The aim of this study was to investigate long-term clinical outcome and stent patency. Twenty patients were treated with venous stenting for benign disease at our institution between 1987 and 2005. Fifteen of 20 patients (15 female, mean age at time of stent implantation 38 years [range 18-66]) returned for a clinical visit, a plain X-ray of the stent, and a Duplex ultrasound. Four patients were lost to follow-up, and one patient died 277 months after stent placement although a good clinical result was documented 267 months after stent placement. Mean follow-up after stent placement was 167.8 months (13.9 years) (range 71 (6 years) to 267 months [22 years]). No patient needed an additional venous intervention after stent implantation. No significant difference between the circumference of the thigh on the stented side (mean 55.1 cm [range 47.0-70.0]) compared with the contralateral thigh (mean 54.9 cm [range 47.0-70.0]) (p=0.684) was seen. There was a nonsignificant trend toward higher flow velocities within the stent (mean 30.8 cm/s [range 10.0-48.0]) and the corresponding vein segment on the contralateral side (mean 25.2 cm/s [range 12.0-47.0]) (p=0.065). Stent integrity was confirmed in 14 of 15 cases. Only one stent showed a fracture, as documented on x-ray, without any impairment of flow. Venous stenting using Wallstents showed excellent long-term clinical outcome and primary patency rate.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20593287 PMCID: PMC3096768 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-010-9927-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ISSN: 0174-1551 Impact factor: 2.740
Summary of patient data
| Patient no. | Age at time of stent placement (y) | Follow-up (mo) | Indication for stent insertion | Stent localisation | Wallstent size (mm) | Stent integrity | Velocity within stent and corresponding contralateral segment (cm/s) | Diameter of the thigh and the calf of the leg with the stent compared with the contralateral side (cm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66 | 219 | Iatrogenic stenosis after crossectomy for varicose veins | Common femoral vein left | 14/50 | Yes | 10 within stent, 20 contralateral side | Stent extremity: | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 53 | Thigh: 53 | ||||||||
| Lower part: 34 | Lower part: 33 | ||||||||
| 2 | 46 | 196 | Iatrogenic stenosis due to a hematoma after coronary angiography | External iliac vein right | 14/50 | Yes | 18 within stent, 15 contralateral side | Stent extremity: | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 49 | Thigh: 50 | ||||||||
| Lower part: 33 | Lower part: 34 | ||||||||
| 3 | 47 | 171 | May-Thurner syndrome with acute thrombosis. | Common iliac vein left | 16/60 | Yes | 30 within stent, 20 contralateral side | Stent extremity: | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 55 | Thigh: 54 | ||||||||
| Lower part: 40 | Lower part: 41 | ||||||||
| 4 | 18 | 111 | Factor V Leiden mutation and acute 4-level thrombosis of the left leg | Common iliac vein left | 16/90 | Yes | 20 within stent; 47 contralateral side | Stent extremity: | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 70 | Thigh: 70 | ||||||||
| Lower part:4 4 | Lower part: 44 | ||||||||
| 5 | 54 | 180 | Chronic thrombosis of the iliac vein; massive signs of CVI despite operative Palma shunt with persistent AV shun. | Common iliac vein + external iliac vein left | 12/89; 12/66; 14/96; 16/6.1 | Yes | 41 within stent, 13 contralateral side | Stent extremity: | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 57 | Thigh: 57 | ||||||||
| Lower part: 42 | Lower part: 41 | ||||||||
| 6 | 45 | 205 | Iatrogenic thrombosis of the common iliac vein left after crossectomy | Common iliac vein left | 16/90 | Yes | 43 within stent; 30 contralateral side | Stent extremity | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 65 | Thigh: 59 | ||||||||
| Lower part: 36 | Lower part: 31 | ||||||||
| 7 | 40 | 186 | Chronic left pelvic vein thrombosis in the case of May-Thurner syndrome and persistent pressure gradient despite a Palma shunt | Common and external iliac vein left | 10/60; 12/60; 14/60 | Yes | 44 within stent; 33 contralateral side |
|
|
| Thigh: 53 | Thigh: 58 | ||||||||
| Lower part: 40 | Lower part: 37 | ||||||||
| 8 | 50 | 168 | May-Thurner syndrome with acute thrombosis | Common iliac vein left | 16/90 | Yes | 15 within stent; 20 contralateral side | Stent extremity: | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 54 | Thigh: 54 | ||||||||
| Lower part: 37 | Lower part: 37 | ||||||||
| 9 | 18 | 71 | May-Thurner syndrome with acute thrombosis | Common iliac vein left | 14/70 | Yes | 24 within stent; 19 contralateral side | Stent extremity: | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 61 | Thigh: 60 | ||||||||
| Lower part: 41 | Lower part: 40 | ||||||||
| 10 | 23 | 148 | May-Thurner syndrome with acute thrombosis | Common iliac vein left | 12/80 | Yes | 43 within stent; 33 contralateral side | Stent extremity: | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 47 | Thigh: 47 | ||||||||
| Lower part: 35 | Lower part: 35 | ||||||||
| 11 | 41 | 135 | Iatrogenic stenosis after venous stripping | Common femoral vein right | 12/80 | Yes | 21 cm/seconds within the stent 12 cm/seconds contralateral side | Stent extremity: | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 51 | Thigh:52 | ||||||||
| Lower part:35 | Lower part:35 | ||||||||
| 12 | 34 | 222 months | Stenosis after jugular vein interponate in the common femoral vein after iatrogenic transection | Common femoral vein right | 2 × 12/75 | Yes | 48 within stent; 40 contralateral side | Stent extremity: | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 47 | Thigh: 48 | ||||||||
| Lower part: 30 | Lower part: 33 | ||||||||
| 13 | 31 | 83 | Chronic thrombosis after hip surgery and factor V Leiden mutation | Common femoral vein left | 12/90; 14/90 | Yes | 30 within stent; 28 contralateral side | Stent extremity: | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 49 | Thigh:48 | ||||||||
| Lower part:34 | Lower part:33 | ||||||||
| 14 | 33 | 267 | Stab wound injury; stenosis of the jugular vein interponate | Superficial femoral vein right | 2 × 14/70 | Stent fracture | 30 within stent; 28 contralateral side | Stent extremity: | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 61 | Thigh: 60 | ||||||||
| Lower part: 49 | Lower part: 48 | ||||||||
| 15 | 24 | 155 | May-Thurner syndrome with acute thrombosis | Common iliac vein left | 14/80 | Yes | 45 within stent; 20 contralateral side | Stent extremity: | Nonstent extremity: |
| Thigh: 55 | Thigh: 54 | ||||||||
| Lower part: 36 | Lower part: 34 | ||||||||
Fig. 1Shows X-ray of the pelvis, including a magnified view demonstrating the integrity of the stent in the left common iliac vein 13 years after placement for acute thrombosis due to a May–Thurner syndrome
Fig. 2Serial venograms during a follow-up period of 22 years (patient no. 14) after a stab wound injury of the right superficial femoral vein, which was treated with a venous interposition graft, resulting in stenosis of the femoral vein. A Venogram shows severe stenosis corresponding to the venous interposition graft. B Venogram taken after placement of two 14 × 70-mm Wallstents in the superficial femoral vein. C Venogram taken 4 years later shows new soft-tissue calcification adjacent to the patent stent (arrow), which was interpreted as a calcified hematoma or myositis ossificans. The stent is intact at follow-up of 6, 8, and 22 years. D, F A stent fracture can be noticed (curved arrow), which remained mostly unchanged over the years, with no signs of flow impairment or clinical signs of leg swelling. The likely cause of the stent fracture can be identified as the pointed part of the calcification (arrow) interfering with the stent
Fig. 3A X-ray of the right hip in a bent position after placement of two 12 × 75-mm Wallstents in the common femoral vein (patient no. 12) shows good adaption of the Wallstent to the curving course of the common femoral vein, with no signs of kinking or damage to the stent The upper and lower edges of the stent are marked with arrows. B X-ray of the hip of the same patient 18.5 years after placement shows that the Wallstent remained intact