BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) may develop after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). We investigated factors associated with SIRS after SAH, whether SIRS was associated with complications of SAH such as vasospasm, cerebral infarction, and clinical outcome, and whether SIRS could contribute to a difference in outcome between patients treated by endovascular coiling or neurosurgical clipping of the ruptured aneurysm. METHODS: This was exploratory analysis of 413 patients in the CONSCIOUS-1 study. SIRS was diagnosed if the patient had at least 2 of 4 variables (hypothermia/fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, and leukocytosis/leukopenia) within 4 days of admission. Clinical outcome was measured on the Glasgow outcome scale 3 months after SAH. The relationship between clinical and radiologic variables and SIRS, angiographic vasospasm, delayed ischemic neurologic deficit (DIND), cerebral infarction, vasospasm-related infarction, and clinical outcome were modeled with uni- and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: 63% of patients developed SIRS. Many factors were associated with SIRS in univariate analysis, but only poor WFNS grade and pneumonia were independently associated with SIRS in multivariable analysis. SIRS burden (number of SIRS variables per day over the first 4 days) was associated with poor outcome, but not with angiographic vasospasm, DIND, or cerebral infarction. The method of aneurysm treatment was not associated with SIRS. CONCLUSION:SIRS was associated with poor outcome but not angiographic vasospasm, DIND, or cerebral infarction after SAH in the CONSCIOUS-1 data. There was no support for the notion that neurosurgical clipping is associated with a greater risk of SIRS than endovascular coiling.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) may develop after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). We investigated factors associated with SIRS after SAH, whether SIRS was associated with complications of SAH such as vasospasm, cerebral infarction, and clinical outcome, and whether SIRS could contribute to a difference in outcome between patients treated by endovascular coiling or neurosurgical clipping of the ruptured aneurysm. METHODS: This was exploratory analysis of 413 patients in the CONSCIOUS-1 study. SIRS was diagnosed if the patient had at least 2 of 4 variables (hypothermia/fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, and leukocytosis/leukopenia) within 4 days of admission. Clinical outcome was measured on the Glasgow outcome scale 3 months after SAH. The relationship between clinical and radiologic variables and SIRS, angiographic vasospasm, delayed ischemic neurologic deficit (DIND), cerebral infarction, vasospasm-related infarction, and clinical outcome were modeled with uni- and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: 63% of patients developed SIRS. Many factors were associated with SIRS in univariate analysis, but only poor WFNS grade and pneumonia were independently associated with SIRS in multivariable analysis. SIRS burden (number of SIRS variables per day over the first 4 days) was associated with poor outcome, but not with angiographic vasospasm, DIND, or cerebral infarction. The method of aneurysm treatment was not associated with SIRS. CONCLUSION: SIRS was associated with poor outcome but not angiographic vasospasm, DIND, or cerebral infarction after SAH in the CONSCIOUS-1 data. There was no support for the notion that neurosurgical clipping is associated with a greater risk of SIRS than endovascular coiling.
Authors: Mitchell M Levy; Mitchell P Fink; John C Marshall; Edward Abraham; Derek Angus; Deborah Cook; Jonathan Cohen; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent; Graham Ramsay Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Andrew M Naidech; Bernard R Bendok; Richard A Bernstein; Mark J Alberts; H Hunt Batjer; Charles M Watts; Thomas P Bleck Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: I A C van der Bilt; D Hasan; W P Vandertop; A A M Wilde; A Algra; F C Visser; G J E Rinkel Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jennifer A Frontera; Andres Fernandez; J Michael Schmidt; Jan Claassen; Katja E Wartenberg; Neeraj Badjatia; Augusto Parra; E Sander Connolly; Stephan A Mayer Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Katja E Wartenberg; J Michael Schmidt; Jan Claassen; Richard E Temes; Jennifer A Frontera; Noeleen Ostapkovich; Augusto Parra; E Sander Connolly; Stephan A Mayer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Andrew J Molyneux; Richard S C Kerr; Ly-Mee Yu; Mike Clarke; Mary Sneade; Julia A Yarnold; Peter Sandercock Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Sep 3-9 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Petri Kuusinen; Tero Ala-Kokko; Airi Jartti; Lauri Ahvenjarvi; Pirjo Saynajakangas; Pasi Ohtonen; Hannu Syrjala Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Craig A Williamson; Kyle M Sheehan; Renuka Tipirneni; Christopher D Roark; Aditya S Pandey; B Gregory Thompson; Venkatakrishna Rajajee Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Amelia K Boehme; Angela N Hays; Kimberly P Kicielinski; Kanika Arora; Niren Kapoor; Michael J Lyerly; Alissa Gadpaille; Harn Shiue; Karen Albright; David Miller; Mitchell S V Elkind; Mark R Harrigan Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Elan L Guterman; Hooman Kamel; Carmil Azran; Maulik P Shah; J Claude Hemphill; Wade S Smith; Babak B Navi Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Sahar F Zafar; Eva N Postma; Siddharth Biswal; Lucas Fleuren; Emily J Boyle; Sophia Bechek; Kathryn O'Connor; Apeksha Shenoy; Durga Jonnalagadda; Jennifer Kim; Mouhsin S Shafi; Aman B Patel; Eric S Rosenthal; M Brandon Westover Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 3.210