Literature DB >> 20592647

Estimating the intake of abused methamphetamines using experimenter-administered deuterium labeled R-methamphetamine: selection of the R-methamphetamine dose.

Linghui Li1, Juan Carlos Lopez, Gantt P Galloway, Matthew J Baggott, Tom Everhart, John Mendelson.   

Abstract

All addictive drugs produce tolerance and addicts compensate by increasing drug exposure. Thus, the quantity of illicit drug ingested is related to the severity of addiction. Unfortunately, there are no objective methods to estimate intake for most addictive drugs. Using experimenter-administered doses of deuterium-labeled R-methamphetamine (R-[-]-MA-d3), we have developed a method to estimate the amount of abused methamphetamine intake in addicts enrolled in clinical trials. This study assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of single oral doses of R-MA in healthy adults to select a dose of R-MA-d3 to be used as a biomarker for estimation the amount of methamphetamine abuse. This was a five-session randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, balanced crossover study in eight subjects. Oral R-(-)-MA was dosed at 0 mg, 1 mg, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg; bioavailability was estimated by slow intravenous dosing (30 minutes) of 2.5 mg R-(-)-MA-d3 given with the 2.5 mg R-(-)-MA oral dose condition. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measures were obtained. No serious adverse events occurred during the study and all doses of R-MA were well tolerated. Linear pharmacokinetics was observed within our oral dose range of 1 to 10 mg. Complete bioavailability and pharmacologic inactivity were found for all oral doses. These characteristics indicate the advantage of using a small oral R-(-)-MA-d3 dose as a biomarker to estimate exposure to abused methamphetamine. Based on these results, 5 mg R-(-)-MA-d3 has been selected as the biomarker dose in future studies. Preliminary findings from our study indicate that experimenter-administered oral R-(-)-MA-d3 may allow estimation of abused methamphetamine intake and exposure. Knowledge of the quantity of methamphetamine intake may allow better estimation of disease severity and treatment efficacy. Experience gained from this study also can be applied to the management of other drug dependence problems such as cocaine, cannabinoid, and opiate addiction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20592647      PMCID: PMC3040572          DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181db82f2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  6 in total

Review 1.  Exploratory assessment of dose proportionality: review of current approaches and proposal for a practical criterion.

Authors:  Jürgen Hummel; Sue McKendrick; Charlie Brindley; Raymond French
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.894

2.  Human pharmacology of the methamphetamine stereoisomers.

Authors:  John Mendelson; Naoto Uemura; Debra Harris; Rajneesh P Nath; Emilio Fernandez; Peyton Jacob; E Thomas Everhart; Reese T Jones
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 3.  Pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine dependence: a review of the pathophysiology of methamphetamine addiction and the theoretical basis and efficacy of pharmacotherapeutic interventions.

Authors:  Mark E Rose; Jon E Grant
Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.567

Review 4.  Smokable ("ice", "crystal meth") and non smokable amphetamine-type stimulants: clinical pharmacological and epidemiological issues, with special reference to the UK.

Authors:  Fabrizio Schifano; John M Corkery; Giulio Cuffolo
Journal:  Ann Ist Super Sanita       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.663

5.  The bioavailability of intranasal and smoked methamphetamine.

Authors:  Debra S Harris; Harold Boxenbaum; E Thomas Everhart; Gina Sequeira; John E Mendelson; Reese T Jones
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Gas chromatographic determination of methamphetamine and its metabolite amphetamine in human plasma and urine following conversion to N-propyl derivatives.

Authors:  P Jacob; E C Tisdale; K Panganiban; D Cannon; K Zabel; J E Mendelson; R T Jones
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl       Date:  1995-02-17
  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  A method to quantify illicit intake of drugs from urine: methamphetamine.

Authors:  Linghui Li; Gantt P Galloway; Davide Verotta; E Thomas Everhart; Matthew J Baggott; Jeremy R Coyle; Juan C Lopez; John Mendelson
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Dorsolateral striatal miR-134 modulates excessive methamphetamine intake in self-administering rats.

Authors:  Jing-Jing Shi; Dan-Ni Cao; Hui-Fen Liu; Zhi-Yuan Wang; Guan-Yi Lu; Ning Wu; Wen-Hua Zhou; Jin Li
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.584

3.  Extended-access, but not limited-access, methamphetamine self-administration induces behavioral and nucleus accumbens dopamine response changes in rats.

Authors:  Romain Le Cozannet; Athina Markou; Ronald Kuczenski
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of sustained-release dextroamphetamine for treatment of methamphetamine addiction.

Authors:  G P Galloway; R Buscemi; J R Coyle; K Flower; J D Siegrist; L A Fiske; M J Baggott; L Li; D Polcin; C Y A Chen; J Mendelson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Gut and brain profiles that resemble pre-motor and early-stage Parkinson's disease in methamphetamine self-administering rats.

Authors:  Amanda L Persons; Brinda Desai Bradaric; Leo P Kelly; Sharanya M Kousik; Steven M Graves; Bryan K Yamamoto; T Celeste Napier
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.852

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.