Literature DB >> 20592554

The clinically suspicious cervix--how often is it cancer?

Dimitrios S Milingos1, Vanessa N Harry, Margaret E Cruickshank.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of women referred to colposcopy with the clinical finding of suspected cancer ("clinically suspicious cervix").
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study of women referred to a dedicated colposcopy clinic serving a regional population with a clinically suspicious cervix was conducted. All referral letters were reviewed, and women were identified prospectively when the letter stated "referral for a clinically suspicious cervix." Relevant data were collected subsequently by case note review.
RESULTS: One hundred four women were identified, and 95 attended for colposcopy from September 2006 to January 2008. Nine women defaulted. Seventy-six (80%) had a normal cervix or a benign cervical pathological result. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was detected in 15 patients (16%), and only 4 women (4%) had invasive cancer confirmed.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that women referred with a clinically suspicious cervix should be assessed in a general gynecology clinic rather than colposcopy because most will not have cancer. The small number of women with a clinical cancer can then be referred onto colposcopy, whereas women with benign pathological result can be treated appropriately in the general clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20592554     DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181cb4c7d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  2 in total

Review 1.  Performance characteristics of visualising the cervix in symptomatic young females: a review of primary care records in females with and without cervical cancer.

Authors:  Anita Wey Wey Lim; Willie Hamilton; Antony Hollingworth; Sally Stapley; Peter Sasieni
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The use, quality and effectiveness of pelvic examination in primary care for the detection of gynaecological cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pauline Williams; Peter Murchie; Maggie E Cruickshank; Christine M Bond; Christopher D Burton
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.267

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.