Literature DB >> 20591705

Increased efficacy of early spinal cord stimulation in an animal model of neuropathic pain.

Michiel Truin1, Maarten van Kleef, Bengt Linderoth, Helwin Smits, Sofie P M Janssen, Elbert A J Joosten.   

Abstract

Although spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment for chronic neuropathic pain, pain relief is still not successful in a large group of patients. We suggest that the success of SCS may be related to the timing of SCS during the development of chronic neuropathic pain. We therefore compared the effect of SCS applied after 24h of neuropathic pain (early SCS) and after 16days of neuropathic pain (late SCS). For early SCS, male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=13) were implanted with an SCS device, followed by a partial ligation of the sciatic nerve. Using von Frey monofilaments, tactile allodynia was assessed 24h after ligation. Animals with tactile allodynia received 30min of SCS. Withdrawal thresholds were assessed just before SCS, during SCS and until the return to pre-stimulation withdrawal threshold. Results were compared with the data from late SCS (n=29). Out of the 13 allodynic animals that received early SCS, 10 (77%) responded to SCS with significantly increased withdrawal thresholds, compared to 38% in the late SCS group. The increase of the withdrawal threshold in the early SCS group could still be noticed 90min after termination of SCS. In more than half of these animals, pre-stimulation withdrawal thresholds were reached only the next day. Early SCS resulted in an increased number of responders to SCS and furthermore an increased duration of the effect of SCS as compared to late SCS. Early SCS treatment of neuropathic rats is more effective as compared to the late SCS treatment.
Copyright © 2010 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20591705     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  6 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord stimulation: neurophysiological and neurochemical mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Yun Guan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-06

Review 2.  Spinal cord stimulation for patients with inoperable chronic critical leg ischemia.

Authors:  Xiao-Pei Chen; Wei-Min Fu; Wei Gu
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2011

3.  Burst and Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Mechanical Conflict-Avoidance System: Cognitive-Motivational Aspects.

Authors:  Koen P V Meuwissen; Maarten van Beek; Elbert A J Joosten
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-04-11

4.  Burst and Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation Both Activate Spinal GABAergic Mechanisms to Attenuate Pain in a Rat Model of Chronic Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Koen P V Meuwissen; Luuk E de Vries; Jianwen Wendy Gu; Tianhe C Zhang; Elbert A J Joosten
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Spinal cord stimulation prevents paclitaxel-induced mechanical and cold hypersensitivity and modulates spinal gene expression in rats.

Authors:  Eellan Sivanesan; Kimberly E Stephens; Qian Huang; Zhiyong Chen; Neil C Ford; Wanru Duan; Shao-Qui He; Xinyan Gao; Bengt Linderoth; Srinivasa N Raja; Yun Guan
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-09-12

Review 6.  Spinal Cord Stimulation and Treatment of Peripheral or Central Neuropathic Pain: Mechanisms and Clinical Application.

Authors:  Liting Sun; Changgeng Peng; Elbert Joosten; Chi Wai Cheung; Fei Tan; Wencheng Jiang; Xiafeng Shen
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 3.599

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.