Literature DB >> 20590775

Local recurrence and surveillance after endoscopic resection of large colorectal tumors.

Kinichi Hotta1, Yutaka Saito, Takahisa Matsuda, Tomoaki Shinohara, Tsuneo Oyama.   

Abstract

Local recurrence rates after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) typically range from 10 to 23%. In our previous study, the local recurrence rate after a piecemeal resection was significantly higher than that after an en bloc resection, irrespective of tumor size or macroscopic features. To reduce local recurrence after an EPMR, it is important to carefully note the circumferences of the edge and base of the ulcer. Recently, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed and recognized for its effectiveness in large, complete, en bloc resections and precise pathological assessments. ESD also showed lower local recurrence rates, ranging from 0 to 3% in previous, retrospective studies. However, ESD showed a higher perforation rate and longer procedure times; thus, it is necessary to improve ESD. An appropriate surveillance interval after EPMR was still controversial, and recommendations of some guidelines ranged from 2 to 9 months. In order to determine the appropriate interval, a randomized controlled study is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20590775     DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.00965.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  7 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colorectum: Feasibility in the Canadian setting.

Authors:  Marietta Iacucci; Gregory Eustace; Toshio Uraoka; Yutaka Saito; Miriam Fort Gasia; Jon Love; Naohisa Yahagi
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 2.  ESD and Pit Pattern Diagnosis: Lessons from a Japanese Endoscopist Working in the United States.

Authors:  Makoto Nishimura
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-09-04

3.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines for the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; Amit Chattree; Jamie A Barbour; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Pradeep Bhandari; Brian P Saunders; Andrew M Veitch; John Anderson; Bjorn J Rembacken; Maurice B Loughrey; Rupert Pullan; William V Garrett; Gethin Lewis; Sunil Dolwani
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Satoshi Shinozaki; Yoshikazu Hayashi; Yoshimasa Miura; Tomonori Yano; Alan Kawarai Lefor; Hironori Yamamoto
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-05-13

5.  Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Takeshi Mizushima; Mototsugu Kato; Ichiro Iwanaga; Fumiyuki Sato; Kimitoshi Kubo; Nobuyuki Ehira; Minoru Uebayashi; Shouko Ono; Manabu Nakagawa; Katsuhiro Mabe; Yuichi Shimizu; Naoya Sakamoto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal neoplasms: clinical experience in a tertiary medical center in taiwan.

Authors:  Mei-Yu Tseng; Jung-Chun Lin; Tien-Yu Huang; Yu-Lueng Shih; Heng-Cheng Chu; Wei-Kuo Chang; Tsai-Yuan Hsieh; Peng-Jen Chen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  Implementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal neoplasms in Sweden.

Authors:  Henrik Thorlacius; Noryia Uedo; Ervin Toth
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.260

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.