S Weiss1, D Benoist, E White, W Teng, D A Saint. 1. The John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Current strategies to ameliorate cardiac ischaemic and reperfusion damage, including block of the sodium-hydrogen exchanger, are therapeutically ineffective. Here we propose a different approach, block of the persistent sodium current (INaP). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Left ventricular pressure was measured as an index of functional deficit in isolated, Langendorff perfused, hearts from adult rats, subjected to 30 min global ischaemia and reperfusion with vehicle only (control) or riluzole (1-10 microM) in the perfusate. Cell shortening and intracellular Ca2+ concentrations [Ca2+](i) were measured in adult rat isolated myocytes subjected to hypoxia and re-oxygenation. The block of transient and persistent sodium currents by concentrations of riluzole between 0.01 and 100 microM were assessed in rat isolated myocytes using patch clamp techniques. KEY RESULTS: In perfused hearts, riluzole produced a concentration-dependent cardioprotective action, with minor protection from 1 microM and produced rapid and almost complete recovery upon reperfusion from 3 and 10 microM. In isolated myocytes, riluzole at 3 and 10 microM greatly attenuated or prevented the hypoxia- and reperfusion-induced rise in [Ca2+](i) and the contractile deficit. In patch clamp experiments, riluzole blocked the persistent sodium current with an IC(50) of 2.7 microM, whereas the block of the transient sodium current was only apparent at concentrations above 30 microM. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Riluzole preferentially blocked INaP and was protective in cardiac ischaemia and reperfusion. Thus block of the persistent sodium current would be a viable method of ameliorating cardiac ischaemic and reperfusion damage.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Current strategies to ameliorate cardiac ischaemic and reperfusion damage, including block of the sodium-hydrogen exchanger, are therapeutically ineffective. Here we propose a different approach, block of the persistent sodium current (INaP). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Left ventricular pressure was measured as an index of functional deficit in isolated, Langendorff perfused, hearts from adult rats, subjected to 30 min global ischaemia and reperfusion with vehicle only (control) or riluzole (1-10 microM) in the perfusate. Cell shortening and intracellular Ca2+ concentrations [Ca2+](i) were measured in adult rat isolated myocytes subjected to hypoxia and re-oxygenation. The block of transient and persistent sodium currents by concentrations of riluzole between 0.01 and 100 microM were assessed in rat isolated myocytes using patch clamp techniques. KEY RESULTS: In perfused hearts, riluzole produced a concentration-dependent cardioprotective action, with minor protection from 1 microM and produced rapid and almost complete recovery upon reperfusion from 3 and 10 microM. In isolated myocytes, riluzole at 3 and 10 microM greatly attenuated or prevented the hypoxia- and reperfusion-induced rise in [Ca2+](i) and the contractile deficit. In patch clamp experiments, riluzole blocked the persistent sodium current with an IC(50) of 2.7 microM, whereas the block of the transient sodium current was only apparent at concentrations above 30 microM. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Riluzole preferentially blocked INaP and was protective in cardiac ischaemia and reperfusion. Thus block of the persistent sodium current would be a viable method of ameliorating cardiac ischaemic and reperfusion damage.
Authors: A Peyclit; H Keita; P Juvin; P Derkinderen; F Jardinaud; D Rouellé; J Boczkowski; J M Desmonts; J A Girault; J Mantz Journal: Brain Res Date: 2001-06-08 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: U Zeymer; H Suryapranata; J P Monassier; G Opolski; J Davies; G Rasmanis; G Linssen; U Tebbe; R Schröder; R Tiemann; T Machnig; K L Neuhaus Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-11-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Yukitoshi Izumi; Seth B Hammerman; Charity O Kirby; Ann M Benz; John W Olney; Charles F Zorumski Journal: Vis Neurosci Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.241
Authors: G J Groeneveld; H J M Van Kan; S Kalmijn; J H Veldink; H-J Guchelaar; J H J Wokke; L H Van den Berg Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-10-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Andreas Schwingshackl; Bin Teng; Manik Ghosh; Alina Nico West; Patrudu Makena; Vijay Gorantla; Scott E Sinclair; Christopher M Waters Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Przemysław B Radwański; Lucia Brunello; Rengasayee Veeraraghavan; Hsiang-Ting Ho; Qing Lou; Michael A Makara; Andriy E Belevych; Mircea Anghelescu; Silvia G Priori; Pompeo Volpe; Thomas J Hund; Paul M L Janssen; Peter J Mohler; John H B Bridge; Steven Poelzing; Sándor Györke Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Niels Eijkelkamp; John E Linley; Mark D Baker; Michael S Minett; Roman Cregg; Robert Werdehausen; François Rugiero; John N Wood Journal: Brain Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 13.501