BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The major drug-metabolizing enzymes for the oxidation of oxycodone are CYP2D6 and CYP3A. A high interindividual variability in the activity of these enzymes because of genetic polymorphisms and/or drug-drug interactions is well established. The possible role of an active metabolite in the pharmacodynamics of oxycodone has been questioned and the importance of CYP3A-mediated effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxycodone has been poorly explored. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We conducted a randomized crossover (five arms) double-blind placebo-controlled study in 10 healthy volunteers genotyped for CYP2D6. Oral oxycodone (0.2 mg x kg(-1)) was given alone or after inhibition of CYP2D6 (with quinidine) and/or of CYP3A (with ketoconazole). Experimental pain (cold pressor test, electrical stimulation, thermode), pupil size, psychomotor effects and toxicity were assessed. KEY RESULTS:CYP2D6 activity was correlated with oxycodone experimental pain assessment. CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolizers experienced increased pharmacodynamic effects, whereas cold pressor test and pupil size were unchanged in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers, relative to extensive metabolizers. CYP2D6 blockade reduced subjective pain threshold (SPT) for oxycodone by 30% and the response was similar to placebo. CYP3A4 blockade had a major effect on all pharmacodynamic assessments and SPT increased by 15%. Oxymorphone C(max) was correlated with SPT assessment (rho(S)= 0.7) and the only independent positive predictor of SPT. Side-effects were observed after CYP3A4 blockade and/or in CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolizers. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The modulation of CYP2D6 and CYP3A activities had clear effects on oxycodone pharmacodynamics and these effects were dependent on CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The major drug-metabolizing enzymes for the oxidation of oxycodone are CYP2D6 and CYP3A. A high interindividual variability in the activity of these enzymes because of genetic polymorphisms and/or drug-drug interactions is well established. The possible role of an active metabolite in the pharmacodynamics of oxycodone has been questioned and the importance of CYP3A-mediated effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxycodone has been poorly explored. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We conducted a randomized crossover (five arms) double-blind placebo-controlled study in 10 healthy volunteers genotyped for CYP2D6. Oral oxycodone (0.2 mg x kg(-1)) was given alone or after inhibition of CYP2D6 (with quinidine) and/or of CYP3A (with ketoconazole). Experimental pain (cold pressor test, electrical stimulation, thermode), pupil size, psychomotor effects and toxicity were assessed. KEY RESULTS:CYP2D6 activity was correlated with oxycodone experimental pain assessment. CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolizers experienced increased pharmacodynamic effects, whereas cold pressor test and pupil size were unchanged in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers, relative to extensive metabolizers. CYP2D6 blockade reduced subjective pain threshold (SPT) for oxycodone by 30% and the response was similar to placebo. CYP3A4 blockade had a major effect on all pharmacodynamic assessments and SPT increased by 15%. Oxymorphone C(max) was correlated with SPT assessment (rho(S)= 0.7) and the only independent positive predictor of SPT. Side-effects were observed after CYP3A4 blockade and/or in CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolizers. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The modulation of CYP2D6 and CYP3A activities had clear effects on oxycodone pharmacodynamics and these effects were dependent on CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism.
Authors: C F Samer; Y Daali; M Wagner; G Hopfgartner; C B Eap; M C Rebsamen; M F Rossier; D Hochstrasser; P Dayer; J A Desmeules Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Chad M Thompson; Heidi Wojno; Elisabeth Greiner; Everette L May; Kenner C Rice; Dana E Selley Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2003-11-04 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Mellar P Davis; James Varga; Duke Dickerson; Declan Walsh; Susan B LeGrand; Ruth Lagman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2002-08-23 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Patrick M Beardsley; Mario D Aceto; Charles D Cook; Edward R Bowman; Jennifer L Newman; Louis S Harris Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Andrew A Monte; Kennon J Heard; Jenny Campbell; D Hamamura; Richard M Weinshilboum; Vasilis Vasiliou Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-08-24 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Nora M Hagelberg; Tuija H Nieminen; Teijo I Saari; Mikko Neuvonen; Pertti J Neuvonen; Kari Laine; Klaus T Olkkola Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: C F Samer; Y Daali; M Wagner; G Hopfgartner; C B Eap; M C Rebsamen; M F Rossier; D Hochstrasser; P Dayer; J A Desmeules Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: K R Crews; A Gaedigk; H M Dunnenberger; T E Klein; D D Shen; J T Callaghan; E D Kharasch; T C Skaar Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-12-28 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Bryce A Griffin; Caitlin O Caperton; Lauren N Russell; Christian V Cabanlong; Catheryn D Wilson; Kyle R Urquhart; Bradford S Martins; Marcelle Dina Zita; Amy L Patton; Alexander W Alund; S Michael Owens; William E Fantegrossi; Jeffery H Moran; Lisa K Brents Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2019-04-26 Impact factor: 4.030