Literature DB >> 20590518

A comparison of rural speech-language pathologists' and residents' access to and attitudes towards the use of technology for speech-language pathology service delivery.

Carolyn Dunkley1, Lydelle Pattie, Linda Wilson, Lindy McAllister.   

Abstract

This paper reports results and implications of two related studies which investigated (a) access of residents and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) of rural Australia to information and communication technologies (ICT) and (b) their attitudes towards the use of ICT for delivery of speech-language pathology services. Both studies used mail out questionnaires, followed by interviews with a subset of those who completed the questionnaires. Data were obtained from 43 questionnaires from rural residents and 10 interviews with a subset of those residents, and from questionnaires returned by 49 SLPs and 4 interviews with a subset of those SLPs. Results show a mismatch between rural residents' and SLPs' access to and attitudes towards use of ICT for speech-language pathology service delivery. Rural residents had better access and more positive attitudes to the use of ICT for speech-language pathology service delivery than expected by SLPs. The results of this study have important implications for education and professional development of SLPs and for research into the use of ICT for telespeech-language pathology.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20590518     DOI: 10.3109/17549500903456607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1754-9507            Impact factor:   2.484


  12 in total

1.  Telepractice for the Delivery of Pediatric Feeding Services: A Survey of Practice Investigating Clinician Perceptions and Current Service Models in Australia.

Authors:  Madeline K Raatz; Elizabeth C Ward; Jeanne Marshall
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Multiple stakeholder perspectives on teletherapy delivery of speech pathology services in rural schools: a preliminary, qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Michelle Lincoln; Monique Hines; Craig Fairweather; Robyn Ramsden; Julia Martinovich
Journal:  Int J Telerehabil       Date:  2015-01-29

3.  Perspectives of speech-language pathologists on the use of telepractice in schools: quantitative survey results.

Authors:  Janice K Tucker
Journal:  Int J Telerehabil       Date:  2012-12-09

4.  Perspectives of speech-language pathologists on the use of telepractice in schools: the qualitative view.

Authors:  Janice K Tucker
Journal:  Int J Telerehabil       Date:  2012-12-09

5.  Simulated in-home teletreatment for anomia.

Authors:  Lambert Dechêne; Michel Tousignant; Patrick Boissy; Joël Macoir; Serge Héroux; Mathieu Hamel; Simon Brière; Catherine Pagé
Journal:  Int J Telerehabil       Date:  2011-12-20

Review 6.  Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: A systematic review.

Authors:  Goris Hung Kn; Kenneth Nk Fong
Journal:  Hong Kong J Occup Ther       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 0.917

7.  Towards development of guidelines for virtual administration of paediatric standardized language and literacy assessments: Considerations for clinicians and researchers.

Authors:  Emily Wood; Insiya Bhalloo; Brittany McCaig; Cristina Feraru; Monika Molnar
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-10-08

Review 8.  Telepractice and Dysphagia Management: The Era of COVID-19 and Beyond.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Ward; Madeline Raatz; Jeanne Marshall; Laurelie R Wishart; Clare L Burns
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 9.  A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth.

Authors:  Teresa Iacono; Kellie Stagg; Natalie Pearce; Alana Hulme Chambers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Stuttering therapy through telepractice in Turkey: A mixed method study.

Authors:  M Emrah Cangi; Bülent Toğram
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.