OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were to identify types of complementary therapy that are most predictive of health outcomes, including functional status, physical health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and mental HRQoL among older adults. DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SETTINGS/LOCATION: The study comprised computer-assisted interviews conducted in participants' homes. SUBJECTS: Subjects included 1683 adults aged 55 and older who participated in the 2002 National Health Interview Survey and the 2003 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. INTERVENTION: None. OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional status, physical HRQoL, and mental HRQoL at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The use of biologically based therapies predicted better functional status, such that users reported less functional impairment than nonusers (p < 0.01), adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, health insurance, household income, and comorbid conditions. Users of manipulative and body-based methods reported less functional impairment (p < 0.05). They also reported better physical and mental health-related quality of life, though these relationships were marginally significant. Other groups of therapies, alternative medical systems, mind-body therapies, and prayer were not predictive of either functional status or HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Favorable effects were observed among users of biologically based therapies and users of manipulative and body-based methods. Other types of complementary therapy had no effects on health status over a 1-year follow-up period.
OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were to identify types of complementary therapy that are most predictive of health outcomes, including functional status, physical health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and mental HRQoL among older adults. DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SETTINGS/LOCATION: The study comprised computer-assisted interviews conducted in participants' homes. SUBJECTS: Subjects included 1683 adults aged 55 and older who participated in the 2002 National Health Interview Survey and the 2003 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. INTERVENTION: None. OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional status, physical HRQoL, and mental HRQoL at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The use of biologically based therapies predicted better functional status, such that users reported less functional impairment than nonusers (p < 0.01), adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, health insurance, household income, and comorbid conditions. Users of manipulative and body-based methods reported less functional impairment (p < 0.05). They also reported better physical and mental health-related quality of life, though these relationships were marginally significant. Other groups of therapies, alternative medical systems, mind-body therapies, and prayer were not predictive of either functional status or HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Favorable effects were observed among users of biologically based therapies and users of manipulative and body-based methods. Other types of complementary therapy had no effects on health status over a 1-year follow-up period.
Authors: Joseph G Grzywacz; Cynthia K Suerken; Rebecca H Neiberg; Wei Lang; Ronny A Bell; Sara A Quandt; Thomas A Arcury Journal: J Health Soc Behav Date: 2007-03
Authors: Steven T DeKosky; Jeff D Williamson; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Richard A Kronmal; Diane G Ives; Judith A Saxton; Oscar L Lopez; Gregory Burke; Michelle C Carlson; Linda P Fried; Lewis H Kuller; John A Robbins; Russell P Tracy; Nancy F Woolard; Leslie Dunn; Beth E Snitz; Richard L Nahin; Curt D Furberg Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-11-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kathryn P Altizer; Ha T Nguyen; Rebecca H Neiberg; Sara A Quandt; Joseph G Grzywacz; Wei Lang; Ronny A Bell; Thomas A Arcury Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2012-08-01
Authors: Blake Victor Kent; Samuel Stroope; Alka M Kanaya; Ying Zhang; Namratha R Kandula; Alexandra E Shields Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-10-24 Impact factor: 4.147