Literature DB >> 20590448

Patients' attitudes to informed consent for genomic research with donated samples.

J Ignacio Valle-Mansilla1, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Daniel P Sulmasy.   

Abstract

This international self-administered survey describes the attitudes of 279 patients, who had previously donated samples, regarding informed consent for future genomic research on donated tissue and explores factors associated with these attitudes. Most of the patients supported a fairly broad consent unless research was industry-sponsored. In multivariate analysis, support for broad informed consent was highest among neurology patients and patients who had already given a broad informed consent. There was a trend for Spaniards to be more supportive for a broad informed consent than their US counterparts. Exploring these opinions may help improve consent and explain why some patients reject broader forms of consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20590448     DOI: 10.3109/07357907.2010.494320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Invest        ISSN: 0735-7907            Impact factor:   2.176


  9 in total

1.  Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research.

Authors:  Altovise T Ewing; Lori A H Erby; Juli Bollinger; Eva Tetteyfio; Luisel J Ricks-Santi; David Kaufman
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Cancer donor preferences for disposition of their biospecimens after biobank closure.

Authors:  Samuel C Allen; Margie D Dixon; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens: The Views of Actual Donors at Four U.S. Medical Centers.

Authors:  Teddy D Warner; Carol J Weil; Christopher Andry; Howard B Degenholtz; Lisa Parker; Latarsha J Carithers; Michelle Feige; David Wendler; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Patient informed governance of distributed research networks: results and discussion from six patient focus groups.

Authors:  Laura A Mamo; Dennis K Browe; Holly C Logan; Katherine K Kim
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

5.  Patient Preferences for Use of Archived Biospecimens from Oncology Trials When Adequacy of Informed Consent Is Unclear.

Authors:  Jeffrey Peppercorn; Eric Campbell; Steve Isakoff; Nora K Horick; Julia Rabin; Katharine Quain; Lecia V Sequist; Aditya Bardia; Deborah Collyar; Fay Hlubocky; Debra Mathews
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-09-06

Review 6.  Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.

Authors:  Flavio D'Abramo; Jan Schildmann; Jochen Vollmann
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Consent for the use of human biological samples for biomedical research: a mixed methods study exploring the UK public's preferences.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Margaret Clotworthy; Shona Hilton; Caroline Magee; Mark J Robertson; Lesley J Stubbins; Julie Corfield
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.

Authors:  Nanibaa' A Garrison; Nila A Sathe; Armand H Matheny Antommaria; Ingrid A Holm; Saskia C Sanderson; Maureen E Smith; Melissa L McPheeters; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Ethical Issues in Research and Development of Epigenome-wide Technologies.

Authors:  Eline M Bunnik; Marjolein Timmers; Ineke Lle Bolt
Journal:  Epigenet Insights       Date:  2020-04-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.