BACKGROUND: Because of the multidisciplinary nature of treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer, the authors hypothesized that treatment at high-volume teaching/research facilities is associated with improved survival. METHODS: After exclusions, 19,326 patients who were diagnosed with advanced laryngeal cancer (stage III and IV) between 1996 and 2002 and who received treatment (chemoradiotherapy [CRT], total laryngectomy [TL], or radiotherapy [RT]) were analyzed from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Facilities were classified into 6 groups (low-volume and high-volume teaching/research facilities, low-volume and high-volume community cancer centers, and low-volume and high-volume community facilities). Multivariate proportional hazards regression modeling was used to determine 90-day, 365-day, and 4-year hazard ratio (HR) estimates. RESULTS: Treatment included TL (37.6%), CRT (29.4%), and RT alone (33%). Overall, 36.2% of patients were treated at high-volume teaching/research centers (average, 17.1 cases per year). Among all patients, 20% died within the first year. In multivariate models that were controlled for covariates, 90-day, 365-day, and 4 year HR estimates for death were lowest for high-volume teaching/research centers. CONCLUSIONS: Receiving treatment at high-volume teaching/research facilities was associated with improved survival. Undergoing total laryngectomy also was associated with improved survival. The current results suggested that the regionalization of care for patients with advanced-stage laryngeal cancer has occurred, because most patients were treated either at high-volume teaching/research facilities or at high-volume community cancer centers. Future studies should investigate the factors associated with better survival at high-volume teaching/research facilities, such as quality of care, processes of care, and referral patterns.
BACKGROUND: Because of the multidisciplinary nature of treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer, the authors hypothesized that treatment at high-volume teaching/research facilities is associated with improved survival. METHODS: After exclusions, 19,326 patients who were diagnosed with advanced laryngeal cancer (stage III and IV) between 1996 and 2002 and who received treatment (chemoradiotherapy [CRT], total laryngectomy [TL], or radiotherapy [RT]) were analyzed from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Facilities were classified into 6 groups (low-volume and high-volume teaching/research facilities, low-volume and high-volume community cancer centers, and low-volume and high-volume community facilities). Multivariate proportional hazards regression modeling was used to determine 90-day, 365-day, and 4-year hazard ratio (HR) estimates. RESULTS: Treatment included TL (37.6%), CRT (29.4%), and RT alone (33%). Overall, 36.2% of patients were treated at high-volume teaching/research centers (average, 17.1 cases per year). Among all patients, 20% died within the first year. In multivariate models that were controlled for covariates, 90-day, 365-day, and 4 year HR estimates for death were lowest for high-volume teaching/research centers. CONCLUSIONS: Receiving treatment at high-volume teaching/research facilities was associated with improved survival. Undergoing total laryngectomy also was associated with improved survival. The current results suggested that the regionalization of care for patients with advanced-stage laryngeal cancer has occurred, because most patients were treated either at high-volume teaching/research facilities or at high-volume community cancer centers. Future studies should investigate the factors associated with better survival at high-volume teaching/research facilities, such as quality of care, processes of care, and referral patterns.
Authors: Nicholas C J Lee; Jacqueline R Kelly; Yi An; Henry S Park; Benjamin L Judson; Barbara A Burtness; Zain A Husain Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Arya Amini; William A Stokes; Bernard L Jones; Sagus Sampath; Robert S Kang; Thomas J Gernon; Ellie G Maghami; Erminia Massarelli; Cathy J Bradley; Sana D Karam Journal: Head Neck Date: 2019-02-09 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Evan J Wuthrick; Qiang Zhang; Mitchell Machtay; David I Rosenthal; Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan; André Fortin; Craig L Silverman; Adam Raben; Harold E Kim; Eric M Horwitz; Nancy E Read; Jonathan Harris; Qian Wu; Quynh-Thu Le; Maura L Gillison Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Caitriona B O'Neill; James P O'Neill; Coral L Atoria; Shrujal S Baxi; Martin C Henman; Ian Ganly; Elena B Elkin Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2014-10-04 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Philip N Okafor; Derrick J Stobaugh; Louis M Wong Kee Song; Paul J Limburg; Jayant A Talwalkar Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 3.199