Literature DB >> 20589434

Serum midkine correlates with tumor progression and imatinib response in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Tamina Rawnaq1, Miriam Kunkel, Kai Bachmann, Ronald Simon, Hilke Zander, Stephan Brandl, Guido Sauter, Jakob R Izbicki, Jussuf T Kaifi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A previous study identified midkine (MK) expression in primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) as a prognostic marker. The aim of the current study was to compare serum midkine (S-MK) concentrations of GIST patients with those of healthy controls and to determine if MK can serve as a prognostic serum marker for these patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: S-MK concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in GIST patients (n = 96) and healthy controls (n = 148). S-MK levels were then correlated with clinicopathological data and the administration of imatinib therapy. In addition, MK expression was evaluated in 39 surgically resected GIST and in 17 leiomyoma specimens on a tissue microarray.
RESULTS: S-MK concentrations in GIST patients were significantly higher than in healthy controls: median (25th and 75th percentiles) S-MK concentration was 235 (139 and 376) pg/ml in the GIST patients and 99 (33 and 198) pg/ml in the controls (P < 0.001; Mann-Whitney U test). Significantly higher median S-MK concentrations were found in GIST with recurrence compared with those without (295 vs 230; P = 0.009). GIST patients with S-MK levels higher than 400 pg/ml showed a significantly worse recurrence-free survival (P = 0.026; log-rank test). Patients receiving imatinib therapy had decreased median S-MK concentrations compared with those who were not treated with imatinib (331 vs 201; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: S-MK concentration is a potential marker for evaluating the progression and prognosis of GIST, especially during imatinib therapy. Further studies could focus on the role of midkine in the tumorigenesis of GIST and responsiveness toward imatinib therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20589434     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1191-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  6 in total

Review 1.  Measuring midkine: the utility of midkine as a biomarker in cancer and other diseases.

Authors:  D R Jones
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  ERβ-mediated estradiol enhances epithelial mesenchymal transition of lung adenocarcinoma through increasing transcription of midkine.

Authors:  Guangfeng Zhao; Yunzhong Nie; Mingming Lv; Lingfang He; Tingting Wang; Yayi Hou
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-06-05

3.  Combination of imatinib mesylate with lithium chloride and medroxyprogesterone acetate is highly active in Ishikawa endometrial carcinoma in vitro.

Authors:  Ayhan Bilir; Mine Erguven; Ezgi Ermis; Mine Sencan; Nuray Yazihan
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Prognostic value of Midkine expression in patients with solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luo Zhang; Xing Song; Yingjie Shao; Changping Wu; Jingting Jiang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-04

5.  Midkine Is a Potential Urinary Biomarker for Non-Invasive Detection of Bladder Cancer with Microscopic Hematuria.

Authors:  Hao Lin; Qingwen Zhou; Weichu Wu; Yulin Ma
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Evaluation of serum midkine and carcinoembryonic antigen as diagnostic biomarkers for rectal cancer and synchronous metastasis.

Authors:  Liechen Ji; Liqiang Gu; Xipeng Zhang; Juan Wang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.