PURPOSE: (1) To determine the safety of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab with concurrent gemcitabine and abdominal radiation in the treatment of patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. (2) To evaluate the feasibility of pancreatic cancer cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) molecular profiling as a potential predictor of response to anti-EGFR treatment. METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic, locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated in this dose escalation study with gemcitabine (0-300 mg/m(2)/week) given concurrently with cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) loading dose, 250 mg/m(2) weekly maintenance dose) and abdominal irradiation (50.4 Gy). Expression of E-cadherin and vimentin was assessed by immunohistochemistry in diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled in 4 treatment cohorts with escalating doses of gemcitabine. Incidence of grade 1-2 adverse events was 96%, and incidence of 3-4 adverse events was 9%. There were no treatment-related mortalities. Two patients who exhibited favorable treatment response underwent surgical exploration and were intraoperatively confirmed to have unresectable tumors. Median overall survival was 10.5 months. Pancreatic cancer cell expression of E-cadherin and vimentin was successfully determined in EUS-FNA specimens from 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab can be safely administered with abdominal radiation and concurrent gemcitabine (up to 300 mg/m(2)/week) in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. This combined therapy modality exhibited limited activity. Diagnostic EUS-FNA specimens could be analyzed for molecular markers of EMT in a minority of patients with pancreatic cancer.
PURPOSE: (1) To determine the safety of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab with concurrent gemcitabine and abdominal radiation in the treatment of patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. (2) To evaluate the feasibility of pancreatic cancer cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) molecular profiling as a potential predictor of response to anti-EGFR treatment. METHODS:Patients with non-metastatic, locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated in this dose escalation study with gemcitabine (0-300 mg/m(2)/week) given concurrently with cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) loading dose, 250 mg/m(2) weekly maintenance dose) and abdominal irradiation (50.4 Gy). Expression of E-cadherin and vimentin was assessed by immunohistochemistry in diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled in 4 treatment cohorts with escalating doses of gemcitabine. Incidence of grade 1-2 adverse events was 96%, and incidence of 3-4 adverse events was 9%. There were no treatment-related mortalities. Two patients who exhibited favorable treatment response underwent surgical exploration and were intraoperatively confirmed to have unresectable tumors. Median overall survival was 10.5 months. Pancreatic cancer cell expression of E-cadherin and vimentin was successfully determined in EUS-FNA specimens from 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS:Cetuximab can be safely administered with abdominal radiation and concurrent gemcitabine (up to 300 mg/m(2)/week) in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. This combined therapy modality exhibited limited activity. Diagnostic EUS-FNA specimens could be analyzed for molecular markers of EMT in a minority of patients with pancreatic cancer.
Authors: F Robert; M P Ezekiel; S A Spencer; R F Meredith; J A Bonner; M B Khazaeli; M N Saleh; D Carey; A F LoBuglio; R H Wheeler; M R Cooper; H W Waksal Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Donald J Buchsbaum; James A Bonner; William E Grizzle; Murray A Stackhouse; Mark Carpenter; Daniel J Hicklin; Peter Bohlen; Kevin P Raisch Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: H Friess; L Wang; Z Zhu; R Gerber; M Schröder; A Fukuda; A Zimmermann; M Korc; M W Büchler Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: H A Burris; M J Moore; J Andersen; M R Green; M L Rothenberg; M R Modiano; M C Cripps; R K Portenoy; A M Storniolo; P Tarassoff; R Nelson; F A Dorr; C D Stephens; D D Von Hoff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L Coia; J Hoffman; R Scher; J Weese; L Solin; L Weiner; B Eisenberg; A Paul; G Hanks Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1994-08-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Henry Q Xiong; Arthur Rosenberg; Albert LoBuglio; William Schmidt; Robert A Wolff; John Deutsch; Michael Needle; James L Abbruzzese Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Agata I Rembielak; Pooja Jain; Andrew S Jackson; Melanie M Green; Gillian R Santorelli; Gillian A Whitfield; Adrian Crellin; Angel Garcia-Alonso; Ganesh Radhakrishna; James Cullen; M Ben Taylor; Ric Swindell; Catharine M West; Juan Valle; Azeem Saleem; Patricia M Price Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Chiao Jillian Tsai; Nathan O'Brien; A Craig Lockhart; Emily Chan; Alexander Parikh; Jordan D Berlin; Nipun Merchant Journal: Gastrointest Cancer Res Date: 2012-07
Authors: J S Liles; J P Arnoletti; A V Kossenkov; A Mikhaylina; A R Frost; P Kulesza; M J Heslin; A Frolov Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-07-26 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Olaguoke Akinwande; Shakeeb S Ahmad; Tracy Van Meter; Brittany Schulz; Robert C G Martin Journal: J Oncol Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 4.375