Literature DB >> 2058802

Locomotor activity responses to ethanol in selectively bred long- and short-sleep mice, two inbred mouse strains, and their F1 hybrids.

T J Phillips1, B C Dudek.   

Abstract

Locomotor activity responses to sub-hypnotic doses of ethanol (ETOH) were assessed in selected lines of mice (LS and SS), inbred strains, and their F1 hybrids. Data were obtained as photocell beam interruptions in a 15-min test for a dose range of 0 to 2.75 or 3.5 g/kg for LS and SS mice, respectively. Biphasic dose-response curves were obtained for LS and SS mice with the SS mice showing a sedative limb of the dose-response curve shifted to the right. The effects of 2.0 g/kg ETOH were also assessed in a diallel cross of the selected LS/SS lines and C57BL/6Abg and MOLD/RkAbg inbred strains. The 2.0 g/kg dose produced a wide range of responses, from sedation in C57BL/6Abg mice to extreme activation in SS and MOLD/RkAbg mice, and no effect in LS mice. The responses of F1 hybrids reflected a typical pattern of partial dominance, with heterosis in some crosses. When present, dominance was in the direction of greater locomotor activation. These patterns were confirmed by biometrical genetic analysis of the 4 x 4 diallel cross of the two lines and the two inbred strains. The data indicate that loci in addition to those responsible for selection for sedative sensitivity in LS and SS mice can influence locomotor activation produced by sub-hypnotic ETOH doses, and that SS and MOLD mice show locomotor activation for different genetic reasons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2058802     DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1991.tb01866.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  7 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of narcolepsy and other sleep disorders.

Authors:  E Mignot
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Comparisons of subcolonies of selectively bred long-sleep and short-sleep mice.

Authors:  B C Dudek; D K Yi; D M Gilliam; K T Irtenkauf
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Glyoxalase 1 (GLO1) Inhibition or Genetic Overexpression Does Not Alter Ethanol's Locomotor Effects: Implications for GLO1 as a Therapeutic Target in Alcohol Use Disorders.

Authors:  Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; Frances A Lagarda; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 4.  Combined and sequential effects of alcohol and methamphetamine in animal models.

Authors:  Alexandra M Stafford; Bryan K Yamamoto; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  No effect of prenatal alcohol exposure on activity in three inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Chris Downing; Christina Balderrama-Durbin; Jonathan Hayes; Thomas E Johnson; David Gilliam
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 2.826

6.  Haloperidol prevents ethanol-stimulated locomotor activity but fails to block sensitization.

Authors:  J Broadbent; N J Grahame; C L Cunningham
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Selective breeding, congenic strains, and other classical genetic approaches to the analysis of alcohol-related polygenic pleiotropisms.

Authors:  B C Dudek; K A Underwood
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.805

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.