PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the optimum dose of contrast material for evaluating veins in the lower limbs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 134 patients who underwent multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) due to suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) were included in this study. One hundred milliliters of iopamidol 100 ml, with 370 mg I/ml was administered. The degree of contrast enhancement of veins in the lower limbs was classified on a 4-point scale (grade 1, poor --> 4, excellent). Regions of interest (ROIs) were positioned in the femoral vein and the popliteal vein to measure CT numbers in these veins. Correlations between the CT number in each ROI and body weight were examined. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD body weights of patients by contrast-enhancement grade were as follows: grade 1, 86.3 +/- 10.2 kg; grade 2, 72.6 +/- 10.7 kg; grade 3, 59.7 +/- 8.7 kg; grade 4, 51.3 +/- 7.9 kg. Negative correlations were found between body weight and CT number for both the femoral vein and the popliteal vein. Grade 3 or better contrast enhancement was obtained in 79 of 81 patients (97.5%) weighing <60 kg. CONCLUSION: For patients weighing <60 kg, 100 ml of contrast material (370 mg I/ml) is considered sufficient for evaluating veins in the lower limbs.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the optimum dose of contrast material for evaluating veins in the lower limbs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 134 patients who underwent multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) due to suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) were included in this study. One hundred milliliters of iopamidol 100 ml, with 370 mg I/ml was administered. The degree of contrast enhancement of veins in the lower limbs was classified on a 4-point scale (grade 1, poor --> 4, excellent). Regions of interest (ROIs) were positioned in the femoral vein and the popliteal vein to measure CT numbers in these veins. Correlations between the CT number in each ROI and body weight were examined. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD body weights of patients by contrast-enhancement grade were as follows: grade 1, 86.3 +/- 10.2 kg; grade 2, 72.6 +/- 10.7 kg; grade 3, 59.7 +/- 8.7 kg; grade 4, 51.3 +/- 7.9 kg. Negative correlations were found between body weight and CT number for both the femoral vein and the popliteal vein. Grade 3 or better contrast enhancement was obtained in 79 of 81 patients (97.5%) weighing <60 kg. CONCLUSION: For patients weighing <60 kg, 100 ml of contrast material (370 mg I/ml) is considered sufficient for evaluating veins in the lower limbs.
Authors: Philipp G C Begemann; Michael Bonacker; Jörn Kemper; Angelika E Guthoff; Kyungja E Hahn; Paul Steiner; Gerhard Adam Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.826