Literature DB >> 20585874

Peritoneal sarcomatosis: is there a subset of patients who may benefit from cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy?

Dario Baratti1, Elisabetta Pennacchioli, Shigeki Kusamura, Marco Fiore, Maria Rosaria Balestra, Chiara Colombo, Elvira Mingrone, Alessandro Gronchi, Gronchi Alessanrdro, Marcello Deraco.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unlike novel molecular-targeted therapies for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), conventional treatments for peritoneal sarcomatosis (PS) are mostly ineffective. As with carcinomatosis of epithelial origin, a rationale base supports an aggressive locoregional treatment of PS, but the use of CRS and HIPEC in this setting is still controversial. We assessed the outcome of clinically and pathologically homogeneous subsets of patients with PS uniformly treated by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
METHODS: A prospective database of 37 patients who underwent CRS and close-abdomen HIPEC with cisplatin and doxorubicin or mitomycin-C was reviewed. PS originated from GIST (pre-imatinib era) in 8 patients, uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULS) in 11, retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLP) in 13, and other sarcoma in 5.
RESULTS: CRS was macroscopically complete in 28 patients (75.7%). Operative mortality was 3.7% and morbidity 21.6%. After median follow-up of 104 (range, 1-131) months, peritoneal disease progression occurred in 16 patients, distant metastases in 5, and both in 13. For all patients, median overall survival was 26.2 months; 7 patients were alive at 46-130 months (ULS, n = 4; RPLP, n = 2; GIST, n = 1). RPLP had the best overall survival (median, 34 months) but 100% peritoneal relapse; GIST had dismal overall, local-regional-free and distant-free survival; ULS had the higher proportion of long survivors and best local-regional-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, results of CRS and HIPEC did not compare favorably to those of conventional therapy. In a subgroup analysis, the combined approach did not change GIST and RPLS natural history. The interesting results with ULS may warrant further investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20585874     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1178-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  21 in total

Review 1.  A critical analysis of the cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy combo in the clinical management of advanced gastric cancer: an effective multimodality approach with scope for improvement.

Authors:  Maneesh K Beeharry; Wen-Tao Liu; Xue-Xin Yao; Min Yan; Zheng-Gang Zhu
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-10-20

2.  Cytoreductive Surgery in Combination with HIPEC in the Treatment of Peritoneal Sarcomatosis.

Authors:  Christina Karamveri; Nicolaos Pallas; Dimitrios Kyziridis; Christos Hristakis; Vasileios Kyriakopoulos; Apostolos Kalakonas; Dimitrios Vaikos; Antonios-Apostolos K Tentes
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-19

3.  Management of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: A Consensus Approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Management of metastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma: a consensus approach from the Trans-Atlantic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG).

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  Contemporary Management of Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

Authors:  Yuliya Olimpiadi; Suisui Song; James S Hu; George R Matcuk; Shefali Chopra; Burton L Eisenberg; Stephen F Sener; William W Tseng
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Primary and metastatic peritoneal surface malignancies.

Authors:  Delia Cortés-Guiral; Martin Hübner; Mohammad Alyami; Aditi Bhatt; Wim Ceelen; Olivier Glehen; Florian Lordick; Robert Ramsay; Olivia Sgarbura; Kurt Van Der Speeten; Kiran K Turaga; Manish Chand
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 52.329

7.  Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in peritoneal sarcomatosis.

Authors:  Reese W Randle; Katrina R Swett; Perry Shen; John H Stewart; Edward A Levine; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 8.  Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy: an evidence-based review-past, present and future.

Authors:  Ahmed Dehal; J Joshua Smith; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-02

9.  Morbidity and mortality of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: national cancer institute, Mexico city, Mexico.

Authors:  Horacio N López-Basave; Flavia Morales-Vásquez; J M Ruiz Molina; Aaron González-Enciso; Silvio A Namendys-Silva; Juan M Medina Castro; Gonzalo Montalvo-Esquivel; Angel Herrera-Gómez; Jaime G De la Garza Salazar
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2011-08-03

10.  A Simplified Peritoneal Sarcomatosis Score for patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  Samer A Naffouje; Kiara A Tulla; George I Salti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.