AIMS: To assess the role of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) levels on admission using a new, highly sensitive assay (hsTnT) in the risk assessment of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied 156 consecutive normotensive patients with confirmed PE. The prognostic value of hsTnT at baseline was compared with the conventional cTnT troponin assay and with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentrations. Long-term follow-up was available for 153 patients (98.1%). Highly sensitive troponin T values ranged from 0.001 to 357.2 pg/mL [median 27.2 (25th-75th percentile 9.4-69.4) pg/mL]. Overall, 100 patients (64%) had hsTnT > or =14 pg/mL. Baseline hsTnT was higher in patients with an adverse 30-day outcome (> or =1: death, need for catecholamines, endotracheal intubation, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation) compared with an uncomplicated course [71.7 (35.5-117.9) vs. 26.4 (9.2-68.2) pg/mL; P = 0.027]. The cut-off value of 14 pg/mL showed an excellent prognostic sensitivity and negative predictive value (both 100%). In comparison, as many as 50% of the patients with an adverse early outcome would have been misclassified as low risk by cTnT (cut-off 0.03 ng/mL). Logistic regression indicated a two-fold increase in the risk of an adverse outcome for each increase of hsTnT by 1SD of the natural logarithm (P = 0.037). Patients with elevated hsTnT levels had a reduced probability of long-term survival (P = 0.029 by log-rank); by Cox's regression analysis, hsTnT was the only laboratory biomarker predicting an elevated risk of death over the long term. CONCLUSION: Highly sensitive troponin T assays may be capable of improving risk stratification of non-high-risk PE.
AIMS: To assess the role of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) levels on admission using a new, highly sensitive assay (hsTnT) in the risk assessment of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied 156 consecutive normotensive patients with confirmed PE. The prognostic value of hsTnT at baseline was compared with the conventional cTnT troponin assay and with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentrations. Long-term follow-up was available for 153 patients (98.1%). Highly sensitive troponin T values ranged from 0.001 to 357.2 pg/mL [median 27.2 (25th-75th percentile 9.4-69.4) pg/mL]. Overall, 100 patients (64%) had hsTnT > or =14 pg/mL. Baseline hsTnT was higher in patients with an adverse 30-day outcome (> or =1: death, need for catecholamines, endotracheal intubation, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation) compared with an uncomplicated course [71.7 (35.5-117.9) vs. 26.4 (9.2-68.2) pg/mL; P = 0.027]. The cut-off value of 14 pg/mL showed an excellent prognostic sensitivity and negative predictive value (both 100%). In comparison, as many as 50% of the patients with an adverse early outcome would have been misclassified as low risk by cTnT (cut-off 0.03 ng/mL). Logistic regression indicated a two-fold increase in the risk of an adverse outcome for each increase of hsTnT by 1SD of the natural logarithm (P = 0.037). Patients with elevated hsTnT levels had a reduced probability of long-term survival (P = 0.029 by log-rank); by Cox's regression analysis, hsTnT was the only laboratory biomarker predicting an elevated risk of death over the long term. CONCLUSION: Highly sensitive troponin T assays may be capable of improving risk stratification of non-high-risk PE.
Authors: Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Anthony J Comerota; Paolo Prandoni; Henri Bounameaux; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael E Nelson; Philip S Wells; Michael K Gould; Francesco Dentali; Mark Crowther; Susan R Kahn Journal: Chest Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Dirk Westermann; Johannes Tobias Neumann; Nils Arne Sörensen; Stefan Blankenberg Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Ziwei Lin; Swee Han Lim; Siang Jin Terrance Chua; E Shyong Tai; Yiong Huak Chan; Arthur Mark Richards Journal: Singapore Med J Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 1.858
Authors: Emmanuel Chorianopoulos; Ulrike Krumsdorf; Nicolas Geis; Sven T Pleger; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo A Katus; Raffi Bekeredjian Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-10-06 Impact factor: 5.460