Literature DB >> 20584767

Test-retest reliability of the Military Pre-training Questionnaire.

M Robinson1, K Stokes, J Bilzon, M Standage, P Brown, D Thompson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal injuries are a significant cause of morbidity during military training. A brief, inexpensive and user-friendly tool that demonstrates reliability and validity is warranted to effectively monitor the relationship between multiple predictor variables and injury incidence in military populations. AIMS: To examine the test-retest reliability of the Military Pre-training Questionnaire (MPQ), designed specifically to assess risk factors for injury among military trainees across five domains (physical activity, injury history, diet, alcohol and smoking).
METHODS: Analyses were based on a convenience sample of 58 male British Army trainees. Kappa (kappa), weighted kappa (kappa(w)) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to evaluate the 2-week test-retest reliability of the MPQ. For index measures constituting the assessment of a given construct, internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha (alpha) coefficients.
RESULTS: Reliability of individual items ranged from poor to almost perfect (kappa range = 0.45-0.86; kappa(w) range = 0.11-0.91; ICC range = 0.34-0.86) with most items demonstrating moderate reliability. Overall scores related to physical activity, diet, alcohol and smoking constructs were reliable between both administrations (ICC = 0.63-0.85). Support for the internal consistency of the incorporated alcohol (alpha = 0.78) and cigarette (alpha = 0.75) scales was also provided.
CONCLUSIONS: The MPQ is a reliable self-report instrument for assessing multiple injury-related risk factors during initial military training. Further assessment of the psychometric properties of the MPQ (e.g. different types of validity) with military populations/samples will support its interpretation and use in future surveillance and epidemiological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20584767     DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqq073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


  6 in total

1.  Reliability, validity, and significance of assessment of sense of contribution in the workplace.

Authors:  Jiro Takaki; Toshiyo Taniguchi; Yasuhito Fujii
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Low fitness, low body mass and prior injury predict injury risk during military recruit training: a prospective cohort study in the British Army.

Authors:  Mark Robinson; Andrew Siddall; James Bilzon; Dylan Thompson; Julie Greeves; Rachel Izard; Keith Stokes
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2016-05-09

3.  Tapering Practices of Strongman Athletes: Test-Retest Reliability Study.

Authors:  Paul W Winwood; Hayden J Pritchard; Justin Wl Keogh
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-10-31

4.  The Development of the College Students' Experience of Family Harmony Questionnaire (CSEFHQ).

Authors:  Qisheng Zhan; Qin Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-12

5.  Development of a questionnaire to evaluate practitioners' confidence and knowledge in primary care in managing chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Mohammad Tahir; Simon Hassan; Simon de Lusignan; Lazza Shaheen; Tom Chan; Olga Dmitrieva
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Reliability of Self-Administered Questionnaire on Dietary Supplement Consumption in Malaysian Adolescents.

Authors:  Mohamed S Zulfarina; Razinah Sharif; Ahmad M Sharkawi; Tg Mohd Ikhwan Tg Abu Bakar Sidik; Sabarul-Afian Mokhtar; Ahmad Nazrun Shuid; Isa Naina-Mohamed
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.