Literature DB >> 20584580

Quantifying the benefit of a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Richard V Scheer1, Achilles J Fakiris, Peter A S Johnstone.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To better define the benefit of a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer, we undertook a comprehensive review of the literature to derive a pooled analysis of crude survival data and quantify the survival benefit of pCR vs. residual disease at esophagectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In all, 22 articles were reviewed. Crude overall survival data, stratified by patients with pCR vs. those with residual disease at esophagectomy, were collected and analyzed using a chi-square analysis. The relative and absolute survival benefit of achieving a pCR were calculated and analyzed. Finally, stratified median survival times were also analyzed.
RESULTS: Overall survival for patients with pCR was 93.1%, 75.0%, and 50.0% at 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively, whereas it was 36.8%, 29.0%, and 22.6% for patients with residual tumor (p < 0.025). The mean relative survival benefit of pCR at 2, 3, and 5 years was 2.05, 2.35, and 2.84, respectively. The mean absolute survival benefit of pCR was 35.66%, 33.79%, and 33.20%, respectively. Median survival times for patients with pCR were significantly longer than for those with residual tumor (p = 0.011).
CONCLUSION: In esophageal and gastroesophageal cancers, pCR seems to significantly increase overall survival in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Specifically, the data suggest that patients with pCR are two to three times more likely to survive than are those with residual tumor at esophagectomy. Moreover, these data suggest that 33-36% more patients survive when pCR is achieved than when it is not.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20584580     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  16 in total

1.  Survival after neoadjuvant approaches to gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Authors:  Michael Xiang; Daniel T Chang; Gregory M Heestand; Erqi L Pollom
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 2.  Present status and progress of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Jinbo Yue; Ligang Xing; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Management of Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction: Finally a Consensus.

Authors:  Lawrence Kleinberg; Malcolm Brock; Michael Gibson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-07

4.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost based dose escalation on neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced distal esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ming Zeng; Fernando N Aguila; Taral Patel; Mark Knapp; Xue-Qiang Zhu; Xi-Lin Chen; Phillip D Price
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-05-15

5.  Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and American College of Radiology Imaging Network Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Neoadjuvant Preoperative Paclitaxel/Cisplatin/Radiation Therapy (RT) or Irinotecan/Cisplatin/RT in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Long-Term Outcome and Implications for Trial Design.

Authors:  Lawrence R Kleinberg; Paul J Catalano; Arlene A Forastiere; Steven M Keller; Edith P Mitchel; Pramila Rani Anne; Al B Benson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Treatment outcomes of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yong-Hyub Kim; Sang-Yun Song; Hyun-Jeong Shim; Woong-Ki Chung; Sung-Ja Ahn; Mee Sun Yoon; Jae-Uk Jeong; Ju-Young Song; Taek-Keun Nam
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2015-03-31

7.  A prognostic nomogram for overall survival after neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Wei Deng; Qifeng Wang; Zefen Xiao; Lijun Tan; Zhao Yang; Zongmei Zhou; Hongxing Zhang; Dongfu Chen; Qinfu Feng; Jun Liang; Yexiong Li; Jie He; Shugeng Gao; Kelin Sun; Guiyu Cheng; Xiangyang Liu; Dekang Fang; Qi Xue; Yousheng Mao; Dali Wang; Jian Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-20

8.  Diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Zhi-Yong Sun; Hua-Wei Wu; Chen-Peng Zhang; Bin Hu; Ling Rong; Hai-Yan Chen; Hua-Ying Xie; Yu-Ming Wang; Hai-Ping Lin; Yong-Rui Bai; Qing Ye; Xiu-Mei Ma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Comparison of cisplatinum/paclitaxel with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for nonsurgical locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Guofang Hu; Zhehai Wang; Yuan Wang; Qingqing Zhang; Ning Tang; Jun Guo; Liyan Liu; Xiao Han
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  Comparison of definitive chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone in patients older than 75 years with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Qian Zhao; Guofang Hu; Wei Xiao; Yan Chen; Meng Shen; Qiang Tang; Xu Ning
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.