Literature DB >> 20584196

Sensory-specific clock components and memory mechanisms: investigation with parallel timing.

Pierre-Luc Gamache1, Simon Grondin.   

Abstract

A challenge for researchers in the time-perception field is to determine whether temporal processing is governed by a central mechanism or by multiple mechanisms working in concert. Behavioral studies of parallel timing offer interesting insights into the question, although the conclusions fail to converge. Most of these studies focus on the number-of-clocks issue, but the commonality of memory mechanisms involved in time processing is often neglected. The present experiment aims to address a straightforward question: do signals from different modalities marking time intervals share the same clock and/or the same memory resources? To this end, an interval reproduction task involving the parallel timing of two sensory signals presented either in the same modality or in different modalities was conducted. The memory component was tested by manipulating the delay separating the presentation of the target intervals and the moment when the reproduction of one of these began. Results show that there is more variance when only visually marked intervals are presented, and this effect is exacerbated with longer retention delays. Finally, when there is only one interval to process, encoding the interval with signals delivered from two modalities helps to reduce variance. Taken together, these results suggest that the hypothesis stating that there are sensory-specific clock components and memory mechanisms is viable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20584196     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07197.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  10 in total

1.  On the interplay of visuospatial and audiotemporal dominance: Evidence from a multimodal kappa effect.

Authors:  Karin M Bausenhart; Katrina R Quinn
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Smelling Time: A Neural Basis for Olfactory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Barry W Ache; Andrew M Hein; Yuriy V Bobkov; Jose C Principe
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  The sensory representation of time.

Authors:  Domenica Bueti
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-08

4.  Perceived duration of Visual and Tactile Stimuli Depends on Perceived Speed.

Authors:  Alice Tomassini; Monica Gori; David Burr; Giulio Sandini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-12

5.  Cross-modal distortion of time perception: demerging the effects of observed and performed motion.

Authors:  Joachim Hass; Stefan Blaschke; J Michael Herrmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Why studying intermodal duration discrimination matters.

Authors:  Simon Grondin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-01

7.  Duration Comparisons for Vision and Touch Are Dependent on Presentation Order and Temporal Context.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Kamilla N Miller; Michael E Rudd; Michael A Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-23

8.  Reducing bias in auditory duration reproduction by integrating the reproduced signal.

Authors:  Zhuanghua Shi; Stephanie Ganzenmüller; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The duration of uncertain times: audiovisual information about intervals is integrated in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Jess Hartcher-O'Brien; Massimiliano Di Luca; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Visual Timing of Structured Dance Movements Resembles Auditory Rhythm Perception.

Authors:  Yi-Huang Su; Elvira Salazar-López
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.599

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.