Literature DB >> 20584177

Staying within the lines: the formation of visuospatial boundaries influences multisensory feature integration.

Ian C Fiebelkorn1, John J Foxe, Theodore H Schwartz, Sophie Molholm.   

Abstract

The brain processes multisensory features of an object (e.g., its sound and shape) in separate cortical regions. A key question is how representations of these features bind together to form a coherent percept (the 'binding problem'). Here we tested the hypothesis that the determination of an object's visuospatial boundaries is paramount to the linking of its multisensory features (i.e., that the refinement of attended space through the formation of visual boundaries establishes the boundaries for multisensory feature integration). We recorded both scalp and intracranial electrophysiological data in response to Kanizsa-type illusory contour stimuli (in which pacman-like elements give the impression of a single object), their non-illusory counterparts, and auditory stimuli. Participants performed a visual task and ignored sounds. Enhanced processing of task-irrelevant sounds when paired with attended visual stimuli served as our metric for multisensory feature integration [e.g., Busse et al. (2005) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102: 18751-18756]. According to our hypothesis, task-irrelevant sounds paired with Kanizsa-type illusory contour stimuli (which have well-defined boundaries) should receive enhanced processing relative to task-irrelevant sounds paired with non-illusory contour stimuli (which have ambiguous boundaries). The scalp data clearly support this prediction and, combined with the intracranial data, advocate for an important extension of models for multisensory feature integration. We propose a model in which (i) the visual boundaries of an object are established through processing in occipitotemporal cortex, and (ii) attention then spreads to cortical regions that process features that fall within the object's established visual boundaries, including its task-irrelevant multisensory features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20584177     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07196.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  17 in total

1.  Pitting binding against selection--electrophysiological measures of feature-based attention are attenuated by Gestalt object grouping.

Authors:  Adam C Snyder; Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Ready, set, reset: stimulus-locked periodicity in behavioral performance demonstrates the consequences of cross-sensory phase reset.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; John S Butler; Manuel R Mercier; Adam C Snyder; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Disambiguating the roles of area V1 and the lateral occipital complex (LOC) in contour integration.

Authors:  Marina Shpaner; Sophie Molholm; Emmajane Forde; John J Foxe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Early electrophysiological indices of illusory contour processing within the lateral occipital complex are virtually impervious to manipulations of illusion strength.

Authors:  Ted S Altschuler; Sophie Molholm; Natalie N Russo; Adam C Snyder; Alice B Brandwein; Daniella Blanco; John J Foxe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The countervailing forces of binding and selection in vision.

Authors:  Adam C Snyder; John J Foxe
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Common or redundant neural circuits for duration processing across audition and touch.

Authors:  John S Butler; Sophie Molholm; Ian C Fiebelkorn; Manuel R Mercier; Theodore H Schwartz; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Atypical category processing and hemispheric asymmetries in high-functioning children with autism: revealed through high-density EEG mapping.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; Mark E McCourt; Kristina N Dumas; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  The effort to close the gap: tracking the development of illusory contour processing from childhood to adulthood with high-density electrical mapping.

Authors:  Ted S Altschuler; Sophie Molholm; John S Butler; Manuel R Mercier; Alice B Brandwein; John J Foxe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Learning to associate auditory and visual stimuli: behavioral and neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicholas Altieri; Ryan A Stevenson; Mark T Wallace; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  "What" and "where" in auditory sensory processing: a high-density electrical mapping study of distinct neural processes underlying sound object recognition and sound localization.

Authors:  Victoria M Leavitt; Sophie Molholm; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; John J Foxe
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.