Literature DB >> 20584030

Parental origin of apparently balanced de novo complex chromosomal rearrangements investigated by microdissection, whole genome amplification, and microsatellite-mediated haplotype analysis.

V Grossmann1, M Höckner, H Karmous-Benailly, D Liang, R Puttinger, R Quadrelli, B Röthlisberger, A Huber, L Wu, A Spreiz, C Fauth, M Erdel, J Zschocke, G Utermann, D Kotzot.   

Abstract

Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) are rare findings in clinical cytogenetics. As a result of the high risk of unbalanced segregation, familial cases are even rarer and maternal transmission occurs more frequently than paternal transmission. Analogous to Drosophila and mice, as well as to CCRs involving the Y chromosome or a clinically relevant associated deletion, a preferential origin in spermatogenesis has been assumed but not proven directly and systematically thus far. Here, we investigated three healthy adults, one healthy child, and one child with multiple congenital anomalies and various balanced de novo CCRs. The analyses were performed in each case on 10 copies of a derivative chromosome and their normal homologs by glass-needle microdissection, whole genome amplification (WGA), and microsatellite-mediated haplotype analysis. With respect to the number of chromosomes involved in each case and in all cases together, the number of chromosomal segments in each case and in all cases together, and the number of breakpoints in each case and in all cases together, the conformity for paternal origin of all derivative chromosomes and maternal origin of their normal homologs makes formation in paternal germline more likely than a postzygotic formation with an accidental uniformity. In conclusion, our results confirm the preferential formation of de novo balanced CCRs in the paternal germline.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20584030     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01419.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Iceberg under Water: Unexplored Complexity of Chromoanagenesis in Congenital Disorders.

Authors:  Cinthya J Zepeda-Mendoza; Cynthia C Morton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Unbalanced translocations arise from diverse mutational mechanisms including chromothripsis.

Authors:  Brooke Weckselblatt; Karen E Hermetz; M Katharine Rudd
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Y fuse? Sex chromosome fusions in fishes and reptiles.

Authors:  Matthew W Pennell; Mark Kirkpatrick; Sarah P Otto; Jana C Vamosi; Catherine L Peichel; Nicole Valenzuela; Jun Kitano
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  De novo balanced reciprocal translocation t(2;3)(q31;q27) in a fetus conceived using PGD in a t(2;14)(q35;q32.1) balanced reciprocal translocation carrier mother.

Authors:  Ji Won Kim; Sung Han Shim; Woo Sik Lee
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2017-04-18

Review 5.  Mosaicism for structural non-centromeric autosomal rearrangements in disease-defined carriers: sex differences in the rearrangements profile and maternal age distributions.

Authors:  Natalia V Kovaleva; Philip D Cotter
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Insertional translocation involving an additional nonchromothriptic chromosome in constitutional chromothripsis: Rule or exception?

Authors:  Nehir Edibe Kurtas; Luciano Xumerle; Ursula Giussani; Alessandra Pansa; Laura Cardarelli; Veronica Bertini; Angelo Valetto; Thomas Liehr; Maria Clara Bonaglia; Edoardo Errichiello; Massimo Delledonne; Orsetta Zuffardi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.183

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.