Literature DB >> 20583932

Outcomes of cystocele repair surgery in relation to different anesthesia methods.

Mojgan Pakbaz1, Ingrid Mogren, Mats Löfgren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate outcomes of cystocele surgery by different anesthesia and evaluation of patient satisfaction.
DESIGN: Population-based, retrospective study.
SETTING: All clinics that included patients in the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery. POPULATION: A total of 1,364 women who underwent cystocele repair from January 2006 to June 2009.
METHODS: The study population was retrieved from the Register among women who had surgery and where there was complete information on concurrently used anesthesia. Clinical variables were compared. Peri- and postoperative complications were investigated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to identify independent factors for patient satisfaction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to recovery, complications and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: We found a wide variation between hospitals with respect to use of local anesthesia (LA) in cystocele surgery. Length of hospital stay, duration of use of postoperative painkilling drugs, and patient-reported time to return to daily activity were shorter in the LA group compared to the other two anesthesia forms. Postoperative complications did not differ between groups. Age (> or =50 years) and patient-reported complications were independent factors related to patient satisfaction (OR 3.05; 95%CI 1.36-6.82 and OR 0.21; 95%CI 0.12-0.36, respectively). Patient satisfaction did not relate to methods of anesthesia.
CONCLUSION: Cystocele surgery can be performed safely using LA thus limiting the use of more invasive anesthesia methods. LA benefits patients and should be increasingly used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20583932     DOI: 10.3109/00016349.2010.487515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  7 in total

1.  Does anesthetic method influence vaginal bulge symptoms and patient satisfaction after vaginal wall repair surgery?

Authors:  Joanna Pong; Katja Stenström Bohlin; Corinne Pedroletti; Annika Strandell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Prosthetic surgery versus native tissue repair of cystocele: literature review.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Antonio Simone Laganà; Ferdinando Antonio Gulino; Alessandro Tropea; Susanna Tarda
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-01-22

3.  Native-tissue repair of isolated primary rectocele compared with nonabsorbable mesh: patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Lene Duch Madsen; Emil Nüssler; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel; Susanne Greisen; Karl Møller Bek; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Operation for recurrent cystocele with anterior colporrhaphy or non-absorbable mesh: patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Emil Karl Nüssler; Susanne Greisen; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel; Mats Löfgren; Karl Møller Bek; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Repair of recurrent rectocele with posterior colporrhaphy or non-absorbable polypropylene mesh-patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Emil Nüssler; Gabriel Granåsen; Emil Karl Nüssler; Marie Bixo; Mats Löfgren
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Impact of surgeon experience on routine prolapse operations.

Authors:  Emil Nüssler; Jacob Kjær Eskildsen; Emil Karl Nüssler; Marie Bixo; Mats Löfgren
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Decisions to use surgical mesh in operations for pelvic organ prolapse: a question of geography?

Authors:  Emil Karl Nüssler; Emil Nüssler; Jacob Kjær Eskildsen; Mats Löfgren
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.