Literature DB >> 20583419

Laparoscopic versus open restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann procedure.

Isidoro Di Carlo1, Adriana Toro, Oriana Pannofino, Elena Patane, Elia Pulvirenti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To present the initial experience with laparoscopic technique of restoration after Hartmann procedure compared to open surgery.
METHODOLOGY: All patients submitted to Hartmann procedure from 2003 to 2008 were considered. The following parameters were evaluated: age, gender, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, indication for the procedure, Hinchey scale, interval between Hartmann and reversal procedure, total operative time of Hartmann reversal, pain management, delay in renewal of peristalsis, start of alimentation, length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality.
RESULTS: Six patients were divided into groups A and B. Patients in group A underwent open Hartmann reversal and patients in group B underwent laparoscopic Hartmann reversal. Mean operative time was 136,6 min for group A and 95,6 min for group B. Mean postoperative duration of nasogastric tube placement was 2 days for group A and 1 day for group B. Group B showed a earlier return of bowel function and earlier restart of alimentation. Group B had shorter length of stay. There was no mortality or morbidity.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic approach showed a shorter mean postoperative nasogastric tube time of placement and a shorter mean hospital stay, with faster resumption of bowel movements and early solid diet alimentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20583419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  8 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor: Perforated Diverticulitis with Generalized Peritonitis: Low Stoma Rate Using a "Damage Control Strategy".

Authors:  Edoardo Mattone; Elena Schembari; Maurizio Mannino; Sarita Magazù; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Italian guidelines for the surgical management of enteral stomas in adults.

Authors:  F Ferrara; D Parini; A Bondurri; M Veltri; M Barbierato; F Pata; F Cattaneo; A Tafuri; C Forni; G Roveron; G Rizzo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Laparoscopic treatment of complicated colonic diverticular disease: A review.

Authors:  Ronald Daher; Elie Barouki; Elie Chouillard
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-27

4.  Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity (the LapRICon procedure): a safe and feasible technique for restoration of transanal defecation.

Authors:  Michael Lim; Mohammed El-Haddad; Kiran Bonam; Dermot Burke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Considerations in Stoma Reversal.

Authors:  Karen L Sherman; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-05-22

6.  Laparoscopic versus open reversal of a Hartmann procedure: a single-center study.

Authors:  Markus Zimmermann; Martin Hoffmann; Tilman Laubert; Karl-Frederik Meyer; Thomas Jungbluth; Uwe-Johannes Roblick; Hans-Peter Bruch; Erik Schlöricke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Neutropenic Diet Cannot Reduce the Risk of Infection and Mortality in Oncology Patients With Neutropenia.

Authors:  Yimei Ma; Xiaoxi Lu; Hanmin Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Laparoscopic Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure: State of the Art 20 Years after the First Reported Case.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Annalisa Ardiri; Maurizio Mannino; Antonio Politi; Andrea Di Stefano; Zia Aftab; Abdelrahman Abdelaal; Maria Concetta Arcerito; Andrea Cavallaro; Marco Cavallaro; Gaetano Bertino; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.260

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.