Literature DB >> 20582496

Office-based core needle biopsy of bone and soft tissue malignancies: an accurate alternative to open biopsy with infrequent complications.

Sheila C Adams1, Benjamin K Potter, David J Pitcher, H Thomas Temple.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biopsy is a critical step in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal malignancy. As an alternative to open biopsy, percutaneous core needle biopsy techniques have been developed. As many studies combine office-based, image-guided, and operative biopsies, the accuracy of office-based core needle biopsy is not well documented. QUESTION/PURPOSES: We asked whether (1) office-based core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms would have few complications and diagnostic and accuracy rates comparable to those cited in the literature for core needle biopsy, (2) diagnostic errors related to office-based core needle biopsy would result in surgical treatment errors, and (3) tissue core quantity and tumor type would affect accuracy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 234 patients with 252 core needle biopsies of malignant bone and soft tissue neoplasms at one institution between 1999 and 2007. Biopsy accuracy and errors were determined on the basis of histologic evaluation of prior or subsequent biopsies and/or resected specimens, when available. We eliminated 19 patients who had needle biopsies: three had the core needle biopsy completed in the operating room and 16 had insufficient documentation or followup, leaving 233 for study.
RESULTS: Of the 233 core needle biopsies, 212 (91%) were diagnostic and accurate for malignancy. Fourteen (6%) biopsies were nondiagnostic. Major errors, defined as a benign diagnosis in a malignant tumor, occurred in seven cases (3%). Minor errors, defined as errors in histopathologic diagnosis or grade, occurred in 24 biopsies (10%). All nondiagnostic and major core needle biopsy errors were identified and addressed with either a diagnostic open biopsy or definitive wide local excision, resulting in no surgical treatment errors. Accuracy was not influenced by core number; however, myxoid lesions showed a correlation with biopsy error. There were no biopsy-related complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Office-based core needle biopsy for diagnosis of malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms has high diagnostic and accuracy rates without associated complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of the level of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20582496      PMCID: PMC3049629          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1422-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  29 in total

Review 1.  Staging techniques and biopsy of bone tumors.

Authors:  T C Heare; W F Enneking; M M Heare
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Surgical biopsy with intra-operative frozen section. An accurate and cost-effective method for diagnosis of musculoskeletal sarcomas.

Authors:  R U Ashford; S W McCarthy; R A Scolyer; S F Bonar; R Z Karim; P D Stalley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-09

Review 3.  Surgical biopsy techniques and differential diagnosis of soft tissue tumours.

Authors:  J M Thomas
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1995

4.  Closed biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions.

Authors:  T M Moore; M H Meyers; M J Patzakis; R Terry; J P Harvey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Percutaneous needle biopsy of soft tissue tumors guided by ultrasound and computed tomography.

Authors:  J Zornoza; M E Bernardino; N G Ordonez; J L Thomas; M A Cohen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Diagnosis of soft tissue tumours by Tru-Cut biopsy.

Authors:  A B Ball; C Fisher; M Pittam; R M Watkins; G Westbury
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Accuracy of the Jamshidi trocar biopsy in the diagnosis of bone tumors.

Authors:  A E van der Bijl; A H Taminiau; J Hermans; H Beerman; P C Hogendoorn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of bone and soft-tissue lesions.

Authors:  A G Ayala; J Y Ro; C V Fanning; J P Flores; A W Yasko
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.722

9.  Evaluation of core needle biopsy as a substitute to open biopsy in the diagnosis of soft-tissue masses.

Authors:  I Ray-Coquard; D Ranchère-Vince; P Thiesse; H Ghesquières; P Biron; M-P Sunyach; M Rivoire; L Lancry; P Méeus; C Sebban; J-Y Blay
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Image-guided percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions in children.

Authors:  Hyun-Joon Shin; Joao G Amaral; Derek Armstrong; Peter G Chait; Michael J Temple; Philip John; Charles R Smith; Glenn Taylor; Bairbre L Connolly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-02-14
View more
  13 in total

1.  Performing MR-guided biopsies in clinical routine: factors that influence accuracy and procedure time.

Authors:  Rüdiger Hoffmann; Christoph Thomas; Hansjörg Rempp; Diethard Schmidt; Philippe L Pereira; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Clasen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Image guided core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions: are nondiagnostic results clinically useful?

Authors:  Manjiri M Didolkar; Megan E Anderson; Mary G Hochman; Julia G Rissmiller; Jeffrey D Goldsmith; Mark G Gebhardt; Jim S Wu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  CORR Insights ®: Image guided core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions: are nondiagnostic results clinically useful?

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Clinical utility of a postprocedural CT scan in CT-guided musculoskeletal biopsies.

Authors:  Lisa Ratanaprasatporn; Jacob C Mandell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Diagnosis and Management of Subcutaneous Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  Makoto Endo; Nokitaka Setsu; Toshifumi Fujiwara; Takeaki Ishii; Makoto Nakagawa; Kenichiro Yahiro; Atsushi Kimura; Eijiro Shimada; Yasuharu Nakashima; Yoshihiro Matsumoto
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-05-25

6.  The General Surgeon's quandary: atypical lipomatous tumor vs lipoma, who needs a surgical oncologist?

Authors:  Sarah B Fisher; Katherine J Baxter; Charles A Staley; Kevin E Fisher; David K Monson; Douglas R Murray; Shervin V Oskouei; Sharon W Weiss; David A Kooby; Shishir K Maithel; Keith A Delman
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Use of diagnostic dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI for targeting of soft tissue tumour biopsies at 3T: preliminary results.

Authors:  Iris-Melanie Noebauer-Huhmann; Gabriele Amann; Martin Krssak; Joannis Panotopoulos; Pavol Szomolanyi; Michael Weber; Christian Czerny; Martin Breitenseher; Guenther Grabner; Wolfgang Bogner; Stefan Nemec; Martin Dominkus; Philipp Funovics; Reinhard Windhager; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Adult soft tissue sarcoma local recurrence after adjuvant treatment without resection of core needle biopsy tract.

Authors:  Odion Binitie; Shawn Tejiram; Sheila Conway; David Cheong; H Thomas Temple; G Douglas Letson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Current concepts in the biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors.

Authors:  Costantino Errani; Francesco Traina; Fabrizio Perna; Carlotta Calamelli; Cesare Faldini
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-06-05

Review 10.  Multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Lukas M Nystrom; Nickolas B Reimer; John D Reith; Long Dang; Robert A Zlotecki; Mark T Scarborough; C Parker Gibbs
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.