OBJECTIVE: To reconcile patients' medicines and to classify drug related problems identified during medication review conducted after discharge from hospital. SETTING: Patients were discharged from the cardiology unit of Westmead Hospital after recruitment into the Westmead Medicines Project which ran from 2004 to 2007. METHOD: This retrospective study involved an analysis of drugs, diseases and drug related problems in medication review reports available for 76 out of 85 patients who received a Home Medicines Review (HMR). Data sources for medication reconciliation and analyses also included hospital discharge summaries (n = 70) and GP referrals for HMR (n = 44). Comprehensive clinical profiles were constructed for the 76 subjects whose drug related problems were identified, coded, and then classified from their HMR reports. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number, type, distribution and international classification of drugs, diseases and drug-related problems. RESULTS: Patients were prescribed drugs for a broad range of cardiovascular, circulatory, endocrine, respiratory and digestive system diseases. Mean number of drugs per patient in discharge summaries: 8.7 ± SD 3.3 (range 3-19); in GP referrals: 8.9 ± SD 4.3 (range 2-23); and in HMR reports: 10.8 ± SD 4.0 (range 3-24). Mean number of diseases per patient in discharge summaries: 4.1 ± SD 2.9 (range 1-11); and in HMR reports: 4.7 ± SD 2.6 (range 1-12). A total of 398 drug related problems were identified for 71 (93.3%) patients with mean 5.6 ± SD 4.3 problems (range 1-21). The most frequently recorded problems were the patients' uncertainty about drug aim: n = 128 (32.0%); potential interactions n = 89 (22.4%); and adverse reactions n = 60 (15.1%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that patients recently discharged from a tertiary care hospital had a significant number of drug related problems. Classification of drugs and diseases revealed a broad range of non-cardiovascular medicines and conditions in the patients from an acute care cardiology unit. We found that home medicines review provided continuity of care and an opportunity for medication reconciliation which revealed marked differences in number of drugs, between hospital discharge and medicines review. The patients' uncertainly about their drugs and their diverse range of co-morbidities indicated the need for timely counselling by pharmacists in the community.
OBJECTIVE: To reconcile patients' medicines and to classify drug related problems identified during medication review conducted after discharge from hospital. SETTING:Patients were discharged from the cardiology unit of Westmead Hospital after recruitment into the Westmead Medicines Project which ran from 2004 to 2007. METHOD: This retrospective study involved an analysis of drugs, diseases and drug related problems in medication review reports available for 76 out of 85 patients who received a Home Medicines Review (HMR). Data sources for medication reconciliation and analyses also included hospital discharge summaries (n = 70) and GP referrals for HMR (n = 44). Comprehensive clinical profiles were constructed for the 76 subjects whose drug related problems were identified, coded, and then classified from their HMR reports. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number, type, distribution and international classification of drugs, diseases and drug-related problems. RESULTS:Patients were prescribed drugs for a broad range of cardiovascular, circulatory, endocrine, respiratory and digestive system diseases. Mean number of drugs per patient in discharge summaries: 8.7 ± SD 3.3 (range 3-19); in GP referrals: 8.9 ± SD 4.3 (range 2-23); and in HMR reports: 10.8 ± SD 4.0 (range 3-24). Mean number of diseases per patient in discharge summaries: 4.1 ± SD 2.9 (range 1-11); and in HMR reports: 4.7 ± SD 2.6 (range 1-12). A total of 398 drug related problems were identified for 71 (93.3%) patients with mean 5.6 ± SD 4.3 problems (range 1-21). The most frequently recorded problems were the patients' uncertainty about drug aim: n = 128 (32.0%); potential interactions n = 89 (22.4%); and adverse reactions n = 60 (15.1%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that patients recently discharged from a tertiary care hospital had a significant number of drug related problems. Classification of drugs and diseases revealed a broad range of non-cardiovascular medicines and conditions in the patients from an acute care cardiology unit. We found that home medicines review provided continuity of care and an opportunity for medication reconciliation which revealed marked differences in number of drugs, between hospital discharge and medicines review. The patients' uncertainly about their drugs and their diverse range of co-morbidities indicated the need for timely counselling by pharmacists in the community.
Authors: Catherine I Lindblad; Joseph T Hanlon; Cynthia R Gross; Richard J Sloane; Carl F Pieper; Emily R Hajjar; Christine M Ruby; Kenneth E Schmader Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: Johan S de Koning; Niek S Klazinga; Peter J Koudstaal; Ad Prins; Diederik W J Dippel; Jan Heeringa; Ruud P Kleyweg; Arie Knuistingh Neven; Jan W Van Ree; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Johan P Mackenbach Journal: Prev Med Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Eliz Markowitz; Elmer V Bernstam; Jorge Herskovic; Jiajie Zhang; Ben Shneiderman; Catherine Plaisant; Todd R Johnson Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2011-10-22
Authors: Catherine Plaisant; Tiffany Chao; Johnny Wu; A Zach Hettinger; Jorge R Herskovic; Todd R Johnson; Elmer V Bernstam; Eliz Markowitz; Seth Powsner; Ben Shneiderman Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2013-11-16
Authors: Eman A Hammad; David John Wright; Christine Walton; Ian Nunney; Debi Bhattacharya Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Daniel D L Bernal; Leanne Stafford; Luke R E Bereznicki; Ronald L Castelino; Patricia M Davidson; Gregory M Peterson Journal: Trials Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 2.279