Literature DB >> 20582417

Population pharmacokinetics of clofarabine and its metabolite 6-ketoclofarabine in adult and pediatric patients with cancer.

Peter L Bonate1, Casey C Cunningham, Paul Gaynon, Sima Jeha, Richard Kadota, Gilbert N Lam, Bassem Razzouk, Michael Rytting, Peter Steinherz, Steve Weitman.   

Abstract

Clofarabine for injection is a second-generation nucleoside analog approved in the United States (Clolar(®)) and Europe (Evoltra(®)) for the treatment of pediatric relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This report describes the population pharmacokinetics of clofarabine and its metabolite 6-ketoclofarabine in adult and pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies or solid tumors. Clofarabine pharmacokinetics were best described by a 2-compartment model with linear elimination and first-order absorption after oral administration. Clofarabine was rapidly absorbed following oral administration with a mean absorption time of less than 2 h and bioavailability of 57.5%. The important covariates affecting clofarabine pharmacokinetics were age, weight, and estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCL). No difference in pharmacokinetics was observed between sexes, races, or disease type. The elimination half-life was dependent on all the covariates but was generally less than 7 h in all cases. A difference in clofarabine pharmacokinetics was observed between adults and children. For a pediatric patient 3 years old weighing 16 kg with an eCrCL of 138 mL/min/1.73 m(2), the population estimates for total systemic clearance and volume of distribution at steady-state were 18.3 L/h (1.14 L/h/kg) and 92.9 L (5.81 L/kg), respectively. α- and β-half-life were 0.9 and 4.4 h, respectively. For an elderly patient 82 years old weighing 96 kg with an eCrCL of 46 mL/min/1.73 m(2), the population estimates for CL and Vdss were 21.5 L/h (0.22 L/h/kg) and 257.4 L (268 L/kg), respectively. α- and β-half-life were 0.5 and 10.6 h, respectively. Because of the difference in pharmacokinetics, adults have higher exposure than children given a similar dose standardized to body surface area. The exact mechanism of this difference is not understood. As eCrCL decreased, exposure increased due to reduced total systemic clearance. In the case of moderate (eCrCL 30 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and severe (eCrCL <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) renal impairment, dose reduction may be needed to maintain similar exposure in an equivalent patient of the same age, weight, and normal renal function after both oral and intravenous administration. 6-Ketoclofarabine was a minor metabolite with peak plasma concentrations occurring about 1 h after the start of the infusion and having a metabolite ratio averaging less than 5% and not more than 8% for any particular individual. 6-Ketoclofarabine was rapidly cleared from plasma with an average apparent half-life of 4.9 h (range 3.9 to 6.2 h). No accumulation of 6-ketoclofarabine was observed with predose samples all below the limit of quantification on Days 8 and 15. Further monitoring of 6-ketoclofarabine is not required in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20582417     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-010-1376-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  11 in total

1.  Preclinical examination of clofarabine in pediatric ependymoma: intratumoral concentrations insufficient to warrant further study.

Authors:  Yogesh T Patel; Megan O Jacus; Nidal Boulos; Jason D Dapper; Abigail D Davis; Pradeep K Vuppala; Burgess B Freeman; Kumarasamypet M Mohankumar; Stacy L Throm; Richard J Gilbertson; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Clofarabine-associated acute kidney injury in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Authors:  Camille R Petri; Peter H O'Donnell; Hongyuan Cao; Andrew S Artz; Wendy Stock; Amittha Wickrema; Marjie Hard; Koen van Besien
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2014-05-27

Review 3.  Optimizing drug development of anti-cancer drugs in children using modelling and simulation.

Authors:  Johan G C van Hasselt; Natasha K A van Eijkelenburg; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Clofarabine and Cytarabine Regimen for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Kristin V Ho; Dominic A Solimando; J Aubrey Waddell
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015-11-24

5.  Simultaneous determination of fludarabine and clofarabine in human plasma by LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Liusheng Huang; Patricia Lizak; Christopher C Dvorak; Francesca Aweeka; Janel Long-Boyle
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 6.  A survey of renal impairment pharmacokinetic studies for new oncology drug approvals in the USA from 2010 to early 2015: a focus on development strategies and future directions.

Authors:  Jim J Xiao; Jiyun S Chen; Bert L Lum; Richard A Graham
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.248

Review 7.  Genotypes Affecting the Pharmacokinetics of Anticancer Drugs.

Authors:  Daphne Bertholee; Jan Gerard Maring; André B P van Kuilenburg
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  'Acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2016 update'.

Authors:  I De Kouchkovsky; M Abdul-Hay
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 11.037

9.  Population pharmacokinetics of clofarabine for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in paediatric patients.

Authors:  A Laura Nijstad; Stefan Nierkens; Caroline A Lindemans; Jaap Jan Boelens; Marc Bierings; A Birgitta Versluys; Kim C M van der Elst; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Effectiveness and Safety of Clofarabine Monotherapy or Combination Treatment in Relapsed/Refractory Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Pragmatic, Non-interventional Study in Korea.

Authors:  Jung Yoon Choi; Che Ry Hong; Kyung Taek Hong; Hyoung Jin Kang; Seongkoo Kim; Jae Wook Lee; Pil Sang Jang; Nack-Gyun Chung; Bin Cho; Hyery Kim; Kyung-Nam Koh; Ho Joon Im; Jong Jin Seo; Seung Min Hahn; Jung Woo Han; Chuhl Joo Lyu; Eu Jeen Yang; Young Tak Lim; Keon Hee Yoo; Hong Hoe Koo; Hoon Kook; In Sang Jeon; Hana Cho; Hee Young Shin
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.