| Literature DB >> 20582204 |
K V Ananth1, M Asad, N Prem Kumar, S M B Asdaq, G S Rao.
Abstract
The present study was carried out to evaluate the effect of methanol and chloroform extracts of Bauhinia purpurea on experimentally induced excision, incision, burn and dead space wound models in Sprague Dawley rats. Formulations of methanol and chloroform extracts of Bauhinia purpurea were prepared in carbopol and simple ointment base at concentrations of 2.5% and 5% and applied to the wounds. In the excision and burn wound models, animals treated with high doses of methanol and chloroform showed significant reduction in time taken for epithelization and wound contraction (50%) compared to control. A significant increase in breaking strength was found in incision wound model with methanol and chloroform extracts compared to their respective bases. In the dead space wound model, methanol and chloroform extract treatment (100 and 500 mg/kg) orally produced a significant increase in the breaking strength, dry tissue weight and hydroxyproline content of the granulation tissue when compared to control. Among the extracts, methanol extract exhibited more activity followed by the chloroform extract. In conclusion, the present study indicated that Bauhinia purpurea leaves exhibited wound healing activity.Entities:
Keywords: Bauhinia purpurea; burn wound; dead space; excision wound; incision wound; wound healing
Year: 2010 PMID: 20582204 PMCID: PMC2883215 DOI: 10.4103/0250-474X.62250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pharm Sci ISSN: 0250-474X Impact factor: 0.975
EFFECT ON PERIOD OF EPITHELIZATION AND WOUND CONTRACTION IN EXCISION AND BREAKING STRENGTH IN INCISION WOUND MODEL
| Groups | Treatment | Excision wound | Incision wound Breaking strength (ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epithelization period (days) | Wound Contraction-50% (days) | |||
| Group I | Simple ointment | 18.66±0.42 | 8.033±0.30 | 387±9.09 |
| Group II | MEBP (2.5%) | 15.33±0.42 | 5.6±0.21 | 425.666±9.00 |
| Group III | MEBP (5%) | 14.33±0.38 | 5.333±0.32 | 458.5±15.22 |
| Group IV | 14.66±0.42 | 5.566±0.15 | 494.333±8.81 | |
| Group V | Carbopol | 17.00±0.44 | 7.333±0.30 | 362.85±19.08 |
| Group VI | CEBP (2.5%) | 16.33±0.33 (−3.94%) | 6.125±0.67 (−16.47%) | 412±13.21 (13.81%) |
| Group VII | CEBP (5%) | 15±0.44 | 5.8±0.22 (−20.90 %) | 461.5±12.15 |
All values are mean±SEM, n=6
P<0.05 MEBP Vs simple ointment
P<0.05, CEBP Vs carbopol; Values in parenthesis indicate % change compared to respective base; MEBP-Methanol extract of Bauhinia purpurea leaves; CEBP- Chloroform extract of Bauhinia purpurea leaves.
EFFECT ON PERIOD OF EPITHELIZATION AND WOUND CONTRACTION IN BURN WOUND MODEL
| Groups | Treatment | Burn wound | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epithelization period (days) | Wound Contraction-50% (days) | ||
| Group I | Simple ointment | 15.83±0.30 | 6.23±0.27 |
| Group II | MEBP (2.5%) | 14.33±0.49 (−9.48%) | 5.86±0.22 (−5.88%) |
| Group III | MEBP (5%) | 12.16±0.40 | 4.200.12 |
| Group IV | 13.13±0.40 | 3.86±0.17 | |
| Group V | Carbopol | 16.500.50 | 6.83±0.18 |
| Group VI | CEBP (2.5%) | 16.33±0.49 (−1.03%) | 6.78±0.42 (−0.74%) |
| Group VII | CEBP (5%) | 14.500.42 | 4.96±0.33 |
All values are mean±SEM, n=6
P<0.05 MEBP Vs simple ointment
P<0.05 CEBP Vs carbopol; Values in parenthesis indicate % change compared to respective base; MEBP-Methanol extract of Bauhinia purpurea leaves; CEBP- Chloroform extract of Bauhinia purpurea leaves.
EFFECT ON BREAKING STRENGTH, DRY TISSUE WEIGHT AND HYDROXYPROLINE CONTENT IN DEAD SPACE WOUND
| Groups | Breaking strength (g) | Dry tissue weight (g) | Concentration of hydroxyproline (μg/g of tissue) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 308.66±17.66 | 77.16±4.22 | 3011.83±822.54 |
| Standard | 564.33±17.12 | 206.7012.53 | 6082.45±363.81 |
| MEBP (100 mg/kg, p.o) | 479.5010.71 | 183.03±6.74 | 4505.98±270.36 |
| MEBP (500 mg/kg, p.o) | 582.66± 3.51 | 219.41±7.82 | 6405.76±265.54 |
| CEBP (100 mg/kg, p.o) | 418.16±14.36 | 139.45±5.67 | 4252.47±130.12 (41.18%) |
| CEBP (500 mg/kg, p.o) | 527.16±15.33 | 197.22±9.40 | 5720.91± 267.6 |
All values are mean±SEM, n=6
P<0.05 Vs control. Values in parenthesis indicate % change compared to control.