| Literature DB >> 20582168 |
Avishek Ganguly1, Soumya Basu, Paramita Chakraborty, Shilpak Chatterjee, Avijit Sarkar, Mitali Chatterjee, Soumitra Kumar Choudhuri.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multi drug resistance (MDR) or cEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20582168 PMCID: PMC2889820 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Structure and Mass spectral study of Iron Complex.
(A)Chemical Structure of iron complex, iron (II) N-(2-hydroxyacetophenone) glycinate (FeNG). (B) Mass fragments of FeNG.
Figure 2Comparison of the cytotoxic effect of iron complex on different cell types.
Dose response curves for iron complex (FeNG) using (A) CEM/ADR5000 (B) CCRF-CEM, and (C) Human PBMC cells, as assessed by MTT assay. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates (4×104 cells/well) and allowed to overnight incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. Next day, cells were treated with increasing concentrations of FeNG for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h incubation. Results are expressed as percentage viability of solvent-treated control cells. Value represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments with four replicates in each.
IC50 Values of FeNG for CEM/ADR5000, CCRF-CEM and Human PBMC.
| IC50 values (mM±SD) | |||
| Compound | CEM/ADR5000 | CCRF-CEM | Human PBMC |
| FeNG | 0.75±0.06 | 0.79±0.11 | Not determined |
Anti-proliferative activity of FeNG was determined using CEM/ADR5000, CCRF-CEM, and Human PBMC following 72 h continuous incubation. All the data are representative of three similar experiments. Values represent mean ± S.D.
Calculation of Resistance factor for FeNG.
| IC50 values (mM±SD) | |||
| Compound | CEM/ADR5000 | CCRF-CEM | Resistance factor |
| FeNG | 0.75±0.06 | 0.79±0.11 | 0.95 |
| Doxorubicin | 0.00025±0.0001 | 0.1±0.009 | 400 |
Anti-proliferative activity and resistance factor used to confirm multi-drug resistance phenotype and demonstrating whether iron complex (FeNG) was a substrate for P-glycoprotein. The resistance factor was calculated by division of the IC50 for the drug resistance CEM-ADR 5000 cell line by the IC50 for the drug sensitive CCRF-CEM cell line. Results presented are representative of three independent experiments.
*Reference[13].
Figure 3Changes in nuclear morphology of CEM/ADR5000 cells after FeNG treatment.
(A) Morphological changes of CEM/ADR5000 cells treated with 0.75×10−3 M FeNG alone or in combination with 5 mM NAC (one hour prior to FeNG treatment). CEM/ADR5000 cells after treatments with drugs were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde and stained with Hoechst 33258. The cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope. Apoptotic cells showed condensed or fragmented chromatin in the nucleus (arrowhead). (B) Represents the temporal kinetics of apoptotic percentage of CEM/ADR5000 cells. Cells were treated with FeNG alone or in combination with 5 mM NAC for the indicated times. After treatment, cells were harvested and stained with Hoechst 33258. Apoptotic cells were examined by counting the cells with condensed and fragmented nuclei. Each point represents an average of three independent experiments, and standard deviation bars are shown.
Figure 4FeNG induces apoptosis in CEM/ADR5000 cell line.
(A)CEM/ADR5000 cells were incubated with FeNG for the indicated time and then stained with annexin- FITC, which specifically detects exposed phosphatidyl serine residues at the cell surface. The number of annexin-V-positive cells was determined using a flow cytometer and the percentage is represented in each panel. (B) Cell cycle distribution of CEM/ADR5000 cells after FeNG treatement. CEM/ADR5000 cells treated with FeNG alone or in combination with 5 mM NAC for indicated times were harvested and fixed in 70% ethanol. After staining with propidium iodide they were analyzed using a flow cytometer. The percentage of cells in the sub-G1 (representative of hypodiploid DNA content) population is indicated in each panel.
Figure 5FeNG induces apoptosis through mitochondrial cell death pathway.
(A) CEM/ADR5000 cells of both untreated and FeNG treated for indicated time or rIFN γ treated were labeled with anti FasR antibody. Immunofluorescence analysis was performed by flow cytometry. Representative data of 3 independent experiments is presented. (B) CEM/ADR5000 cells were treated with or without FeNG for indicated time, and mitochondrial membrane potential was measured after JC1 staining. The ratio of red fluorescence (mitochondrial JC-1) to green fluorescence (cytoplasmic JC-1) was used as a surrogate for mitochondrial potential. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistically significant difference from untreated control at *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, respectively. (C) Effect of FeNG on the release of cytochrome c. Western blot analysis of cytosolic extracts from CEM/ADR5000 cells treated with FeNG (10−4 M) for indicated hours. Cytosolic fraction was prepared as described in Materials and Methods. Membrane was probed with anticytochrome c antibody followed by incubation with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. The protein was visualized by Lumi glow detection system. Membrane was blotted for β-actin (bottom panel) for loading correction. (D) Densitometric quantitation of cytochrome c levels in the cytoplasm. Immunoreactive bands were quantitated and expressed as the ratio of each band density to corresponding loading control (β actin) band density and values were represented after normalization to untreated control.
Figure 6Reactive oxygen species (ROS) plays an important role in FeNG induced apoptosis.
(A) CEM/ADR5000 cells were either kept untreated or treated with FeNG (10−4 M) and intra cellular ROS generation was measured [in terms of peroxide using dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA)] as described under at different time points. Data are expressed as percent of control and are presented as mean±SD of 3 independent experiments. Differences between control and FeNG treated cells are significant *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, by unpaired Student's t test. (B) NAC completely abrogated FeNG induced ROS generation in CEM/ADR5000 cells. Cells were either kept untreated or pretreated with NAC (5 mM) for 1 h. Then the cells were further cultured for 2 h, 4 h, 6 h and 8 h in the presence or absence of FeNG (10−4 M) and intra cellular ROS generation was measured. (C) Represents that NAC protects CEM/ADR5000 cells from FeNG induced cell death. CEM/ADR5000 cells were either left untreated or pretreated with different concentration of NAC for 1 h. The cells were then treated with FeNG (10−3 M or10−4 M) for 72 h and cell death was monitored by MTT assay. Value represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments with four replicates in each. Significant difference at *P<0.05, ***P<0.001, respectively, from only FeNG treated cells. (D) FeNG depletes intra cellular glutathion (GSH) contents of CEM/ADR5000 cells. Cells were either kept untreated or treated with FeNG (10−4 M) for indicated time points and intra cellular GSH was measured as described under . Results are presented as mean±SD of 3 independent experiments. Differences between untreated control and FeNG treated cells are significant **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, by unpaired Student's t test.
Figure 7Activation of caspase 3 in CEM/ADR5000 cells after FeNG treatment.
(A) Effect of FeNG and caspase inhibitors on the activity of caspase-3 of CEM/ADR5000 cells. Cells were treated with either vehicle (medium) control or FeNG (10−4 M) for 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h or caspases inhibitors; Ac-DEVD-cho (caspase 3 specific inhibitor) and z-VAD-fmk (pan caspase inhibitor) alone (50 µM) or in combination with FeNG for 72 h. After completion of these treatments, cells were harvested and cell lysates were prepared. The enzymatic activity of cell lysates towards tetrapeptide chromogenic substrates Ac-DEVD-AMC was determined. Caspase activities are expressed as fold change of control and presented as mean±SD of three independent experiments. Differences between untreated control and FeNG treated cells are significant ***P<0.001, by unpaired Student's t test. (B) Effects of caspase inhibitor on FeNG induced cell death of CEM/ADR5000 cells. Cells were either left untreated or treated with FeNG (10−3 M or10−4 M) or Ac-DEVD-cho (50 µM) and z-VAD-fmk (50 µM) alone or in combination with FeNG for 72 h and cell death was monitored by MTT assay. Value represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments with four replicates in each. Significant difference at *P<0.05, **P<0.01, respectively, from only FeNG treated cells. (C) Effect of FeNG on the cleavage patterns of PARP in CEM/ADR5000 cells. Cells were grown at standard culture conditions as mentioned in Materials and methods, and treated with FeNG (10−4 M) for 24 h to 72 h, and cell lysates were prepared. Immunoblot analysis was performed to identify the full (116 kDa) and cleaved (89 kDa) PARP using specific primary antibodies. Loading was checked by immunoblotting of β -actin. Bands were visualized by Lumi glow detection system. Data shown are representative of three independent experiments. (D) Densitometric quantitation of cleaved (89 kDa) frgments of PARP in the cytoplasm. Immunoreactive bands were quantitated and expressed as the ratio of each band density to corresponding loading control (β actin) band density and values were represented after normalization to untreated control.