Literature DB >> 20581759

Responsiveness of the Bournemouth questionnaire in determining minimal clinically important change in subgroups of low back pain patients.

David Newell1, Jennifer E Bolton.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective single cohort.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of the Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQ) to distinguish between improved and nonimproved patients who present with either short (acute) or long (subacute/chronic) duration low back pain (LBP), and with either high or low baseline scores (severity). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent evidence suggests that the responsiveness of outcome measures used to determine clinical change is dependent on the chronicity and severity of the condition.
METHODS: Data from 437 back patients undergoing chiropractic treatment were used for analysis. Patients completed the BQ before treatment and 4 weeks later. Patients also completed the Patient Global Impression of Change scale at follow-up. Responsiveness was determined by calculating Standardized Response Means (SRM) and by the area under the receiver operator curve (ROC) with best cut-point analysis. The minimal clinically important change (MCIC) was calculated by the change score with the best balanced sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS: The responsiveness of the BQ at 4 weeks was dependent on both duration and severity of the condition. As expected, the responsiveness of the total BQ was greater in improved compared to nonimproved patients in the acute (SRM [95% confidence interval], 1.9 [1.7-2.0] and 1.2 [0.9-1.5], respectively), as well as in the subacute/chronic group (SRM, 1.7 [1.5-1.8] and 0.5 [0.3-0.7]), respectively. For the psychological domains, SRMs in the acute patients failed to distinguish improved from nonimproved patients (SRM [95% confidence interval], 1.3 [1.1-1.4] and 0.9 [0.5-1.2] for anxiety, and 0.9 [0.8-1.0] and 0.8 [0.5-1.2] for depression). In acute and subacute/chronic patients, the MCIC for the total BQ was 26 and 18 points, respectively. In patients with lower and higher BQ scores at baseline, the MCIC was 10 and 31 points, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The BQ can distinguish between improved and nonimproved LBP patients but the amount of change needed to achieve this is lower in more chronic patients and in individuals with less severe presentation at baseline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20581759     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cc006b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  The posterolateral fluoroscopy-guided injection technique into the posterior subtalar joint: description of the procedure and pilot study on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Florian M Buck; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Florian Brunner; Juerg Hodler; Cynthia Peterson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Lumbar nerve root injections: a prospective cohort outcomes study comparing age- and gender-matched patients who returned an outcomes-based postal questionnaire with patients who did not return the postal questionnaire.

Authors:  Marco Lechmann; Cynthia K Peterson; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Jürg Hodler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Relationship of specific MRI findings to treatment outcomes in patients receiving transforaminal epidural steroid injections.

Authors:  Marco Lechmann; Andrea Rosskopf; Christine Ehrmann; Reto Sutter; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Cynthia K Peterson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The development and implementation of an outcomes database for imaging-guided therapeutic musculoskeletal injections.

Authors:  Cynthia K Peterson; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Relationship between STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for low back pain patients receiving spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan Field; Dave Newell
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-06-12

6.  Imaging-guided lumbar facet injections: is there a difference in outcomes between low back pain patients who remember to return a postal questionnaire and those who do not?

Authors:  Stefanie Kremer; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Juerg Hodler; Cynthia K Peterson
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2012-06-07

7.  Hip MRI findings and outcomes following imaging-guided hip injections.

Authors:  Laura Pochon; Cynthia K Peterson; Reto Sutter; Filippo Del Grande; Erika J Ulbrich; Christian W Pfirrmann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Are the presence of MODIC changes on MRI scans related to "improvement" in low back pain patients treated with lumbar facet joint injections?

Authors:  Matilde Bianchi; Cynthia K Peterson; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Juerg Hodler; Jennifer Bolton
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The psychometric profile of chiropractic patients in Norway and England: using and comparing the generic versions of the STarT Back 5-item screening tool and the Bournemouth Questionnaire.

Authors:  Pernille Irgens; Lise R Lothe; Ole Christian Kvammen; Jonathan Field; David Newell
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2013-11-23

10.  Comparison of treatment outcomes in neck pain patients depending on the sex of the chiropractor: a prospective outcome study.

Authors:  Janine Thöni; Cynthia K Peterson; B Kim Humphreys
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2017-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.