OBJECTIVE: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the role of soy isoflavones on cardiovascular risk factors in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women and have yielded inconsistent results. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the overall effect of soy isoflavones on glucose metabolism: fasting blood glucose, insulin, and insulin resistance. METHODS: We searched for all articles published in English and indexed in Medline from January 1990 to December 2009. We included RCTs for soy isoflavone supplementation in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women not taking hormone therapy, selecting non-Asian women only. The main outcomes were fasting blood glucose changes from baseline. RESULTS: We identified 10 eligible RCTs containing blood glucose data of 794 women. The main result was that soy isoflavones did not affect fasting blood glucose significantly. Under a random-effects model, the average difference in fasting blood glucose values between women assigned to isoflavones and women assigned to placebo was -2.16 mg/dL (95% CI, -5.21 to 0.89 mg/dL; P = 0.17). In genistein studies, the mean difference was -7.15 mg/dL (95% CI, -11.47 to -2.82). However, the effects on insulin and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance were significant: -1.37 microIU/mL (95% CI, -1.92 to -0.81 microIU/mL) and -0.39 (95% CI, -0.65 to -0.14), respectively. Subgroup analyses did not show a significant effect of isoflavone dose, whereas isoflavone mixtures and genistein had a different effect on fasting blood glucose. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of RCTs showed that isoflavone use was not associated with a significant glycemia reduction in perimenopausal and postmenopausal non-Asian women. However, the few studies that reported insulin and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance changes suggested that soy isoflavones and genistein alone had a beneficial effect on glucose metabolism.
OBJECTIVE: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the role of soy isoflavones on cardiovascular risk factors in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women and have yielded inconsistent results. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the overall effect of soy isoflavones on glucose metabolism: fasting blood glucose, insulin, and insulin resistance. METHODS: We searched for all articles published in English and indexed in Medline from January 1990 to December 2009. We included RCTs for soy isoflavone supplementation in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women not taking hormone therapy, selecting non-Asian women only. The main outcomes were fasting blood glucose changes from baseline. RESULTS: We identified 10 eligible RCTs containing blood glucose data of 794 women. The main result was that soy isoflavones did not affect fasting blood glucose significantly. Under a random-effects model, the average difference in fasting blood glucose values between women assigned to isoflavones and women assigned to placebo was -2.16 mg/dL (95% CI, -5.21 to 0.89 mg/dL; P = 0.17). In genistein studies, the mean difference was -7.15 mg/dL (95% CI, -11.47 to -2.82). However, the effects on insulin and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance were significant: -1.37 microIU/mL (95% CI, -1.92 to -0.81 microIU/mL) and -0.39 (95% CI, -0.65 to -0.14), respectively. Subgroup analyses did not show a significant effect of isoflavone dose, whereas isoflavone mixtures and genistein had a different effect on fasting blood glucose. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of RCTs showed that isoflavone use was not associated with a significant glycemia reduction in perimenopausal and postmenopausal non-Asian women. However, the few studies that reported insulin and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance changes suggested that soy isoflavones and genistein alone had a beneficial effect on glucose metabolism.
Authors: Ling Shi; Heather Harker Ryan; Emily Jones; Tiffany A Moore Simas; Alice H Lichtenstein; Qi Sun; Laura L Hayman Journal: J Nutr Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Ming Ding; Adrian A Franke; Bernard A Rosner; Edward Giovannucci; Rob M van Dam; Shelley S Tworoger; Frank B Hu; Qi Sun Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Elizabeth J Reverri; Colette D LaSalle; Adrian A Franke; Francene M Steinberg Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 5.914
Authors: Rita S Strakovsky; Stéphane Lezmi; Jodi A Flaws; Susan L Schantz; Yuan-Xiang Pan; William G Helferich Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2013-12-21 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Peter J Curtis; Mike Sampson; John Potter; Ketan Dhatariya; Paul A Kroon; Aedín Cassidy Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-01-16 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: M Ding; A Pan; J E Manson; W C Willett; V Malik; B Rosner; E Giovannucci; F B Hu; Q Sun Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 4.016