Literature DB >> 20581165

At-a-glance monitoring: covert observations of anesthesiologists in the operating room.

Simon Ford1, Elina Birmingham, Ashlee King, Joanne Lim, J Mark Ansermino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient monitoring displays are designed to improve patient safety, and yet little is known about how anesthesiologists interact with these displays. Previous studies of clinician behavior used an observer in the operating room, which may have altered behavior. We describe a covert observation technique to determine how often and for how long anesthesiologists actually look at the monitoring display during different segments of the maintenance phase of anesthesia, and to determine whether this changed with more than 1 anesthesia provider or during concomitant activities such as reading.
METHODS: Five staff anesthesiologists, 2 anesthesia fellows, 3 anesthesia residents, and 2 medical students were covertly videotaped across 10 dual anesthesia provider cases and 10 solo cases. Videotapes were later segmented (5 minutes postinduction [early maintenance], mid-maintenance, and immediately before the drapes came down [late maintenance]) and coded for looking behavior at the patient monitor, anesthesia chart, and other reading material.
RESULTS: Anesthesiologists looked at the monitor in 1- to 2-second glances, performed frequently throughout the 3 segments of maintenance anesthesia. Overall, the patient monitor was looked at only 5 of the analyzed time, which is less than has previously been reported. Monitoring behavior was constant across the segments of maintenance anesthesia and was not significantly affected by the number of anesthesia providers or role (trainee vs. senior). In contrast, charting behavior and other reading material viewing changed significantly over the analyzed segments of maintenance anesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of "at-a-glance monitoring" has implications for the design of patient monitoring displays. Displays should be developed to optimize the information obtained from brief glances at the monitor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20581165     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e627d4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  13 in total

1.  An evaluation of the Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) for the detection of respiratory events in sedated patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Authors:  Haim Berkenstadt; Erez Ben-Menachem; Amir Herman; Rina Dach
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Reigniting tobacco ritual: waterpipe tobacco smoking establishment culture in the United States.

Authors:  Mary V Carroll; Judy Chang; Jaime E Sidani; Tracey E Barnett; Eric Soule; Edith Balbach; Brian A Primack
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 3.  Augmenting Critical Care Patient Monitoring Using Wearable Technology: Review of Usability and Human Factors.

Authors:  Evismar Andrade; Leo Quinlan; Richard Harte; Dara Byrne; Enda Fallon; Martina Kelly; Siobhan Casey; Frank Kirrane; Paul O'Connor; Denis O'Hora; Michael Scully; John Laffey; Patrick Pladys; Alain Beuchée; Gearoid ÓLaighin
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2021-05-25

4.  Smartphone use habits of anesthesia providers during anesthetized patient care: a survey from Turkey.

Authors:  Hüseyin Ulaş Pınar; Omer Karaca; Rafi Doğan; Ümmü Mine Konuk
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  User perceptions of avatar-based patient monitoring: a mixed qualitative and quantitative study.

Authors:  David W Tscholl; Mona Weiss; Lucas Handschin; Donat R Spahn; Christoph B Nöthiger
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Avatar-Based Patient Monitoring With Peripheral Vision: A Multicenter Comparative Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Juliane Pfarr; David W Tscholl; Michael T Ganter; Donat R Spahn; Christoph B Noethiger
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Can eye-tracking technology improve situational awareness in paramedic clinical education?

Authors:  Brett Williams; Andrew Quested; Simon Cooper
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2013-11-08

8.  Hemodynamic monitoring in the era of digital health.

Authors:  Frederic Michard
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.925

9.  Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study.

Authors:  Olivier Garot; Julian Rössler; Juliane Pfarr; Michael T Ganter; Donat R Spahn; Christoph B Nöthiger; David W Tscholl
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  Situation Awareness-Oriented Patient Monitoring with Visual Patient Technology: A Qualitative Review of the Primary Research.

Authors:  David Werner Tscholl; Julian Rössler; Sadiq Said; Alexander Kaserer; Donat Rudolf Spahn; Christoph Beat Nöthiger
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.