Literature DB >> 20580870

Effects of teriparatide on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in Japanese subjects with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in a 24-month clinical study: 12-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind and 12-month open-label phases.

Akimitsu Miyauchi1, Toshio Matsumoto, Toshitsugu Sugimoto, Mika Tsujimoto, Margaret R Warner, Toshitaka Nakamura.   

Abstract

This multicenter study assessed the safety and efficacy of teriparatide 20 microg/day in Japanese men and women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture during a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period followed by second and third treatment periods (to 18 and 24 months, respectively,) in which all subjects received open-label teriparatide. Subjects (93% female; median age 70 years) were randomized 2:1 to teriparatide versus placebo (randomized at baseline, teriparatide n=137, placebo-teriparatide n=70; entering the second period, teriparatide n=119, placebo-teriparatide n=59; entering the third period, teriparatide n=102, placebo-teriparatide n=50). For subjects with measurements at 12 months, teriparatide significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine L2-L4 (mean percent change+/-SD, teriparatide 10.04+/-5.23% versus placebo-teriparatide 0.19+/-4.33%), the femoral neck (teriparatide 2.01+/-4.63% versus placebo-teriparatide 0.44+/-3.97%), and the total hip (teriparatide 2.72+/-4.04% versus placebo-teriparatide -0.26+/-3.42%). In the placebo-teriparatide group at 24 months (12-month teriparatide dosing) BMD increased by 9.11+/-5.14% at the lumbar spine, 2.19+/-4.81% at the femoral neck and 2.46+/-3.54% at the total hip. In the teriparatide group at 18 and 24 months, BMD increased from baseline at the lumbar spine by 11.93+/-5.79% and 13.42+/-6.12%, respectively; at the femoral neck by 2.68+/-4.45% and 3.26+/-4.25%, respectively; and at the total hip by 3.02+/-3.79% and 3.67+/-3.98%, respectively. Serum procollagen I N-terminal pro-peptide (PINP) increased rapidly with teriparatide treatment (P<0.001 versus placebo at 1 month) and changed from baseline in the teriparatide and placebo-teriparatide groups at 12 months by a median of 78.95% and -17.23%, respectively, (P<0.001) and at 24 months by 49.24% and 76.12%, respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and discontinuations due to TEAEs were comparable in the teriparatide and placebo-teriparatide groups. These data show that teriparatide 20 microg/day was well tolerated and stimulated bone formation in Japanese subjects with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture during 18 and 24 months of treatment. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20580870     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  59 in total

1.  Effects of teriparatide in Japanese and non-Japanese populations: bridging findings on pharmacokinetics and efficacy.

Authors:  Mika Tsujimoto; Kazunori Uenaka; Atsuko Iwata; Yoshihiro Higashiuchi; Hideaki Sowa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Consistency of fracture risk reduction in Japanese and Caucasian osteoporosis patients treated with teriparatide: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toshitaka Nakamura; Mika Tsujimoto; Etsuro Hamaya; Hideaki Sowa; Peiqi Chen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  A comparative effectiveness pilot study of teriparatide for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: daily versus weekly administration.

Authors:  Y Ohbayashi; A Iwasaki; F Nakai; T Mashiba; M Miyake
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  An algorithm using the early changes in PINP to predict the future BMD response for patients treated with daily teriparatide.

Authors:  R Niimi; T Kono; A Nishihara; M Hasegawa; A Matsumine; T Nakamura; T Kono; A Sudo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  A retrospective analysis of nonresponse to daily teriparatide treatment.

Authors:  R Niimi; T Kono; A Nishihara; M Hasegawa; T Kono; A Sudo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Analysis of daily teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  R Niimi; T Kono; A Nishihara; M Hasegawa; A Matsumine; T Kono; A Sudo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Once-weekly teriparatide reduces the risk of vertebral fracture in patients with various fracture risks: subgroup analysis of the Teriparatide Once-Weekly Efficacy Research (TOWER) trial.

Authors:  Tetsuo Nakano; Masataka Shiraki; Toshitsugu Sugimoto; Hideaki Kishimoto; Masako Ito; Masao Fukunaga; Hiroshi Hagino; Teruki Sone; Tatsuhiko Kuroda; Toshitaka Nakamura
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Efficacy of Switching From Teriparatide to Bisphosphonate or Denosumab: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Trial.

Authors:  Rui Niimi; Toshibumi Kono; Atsushi Nishihara; Masahiro Hasegawa; Toshihiko Kono; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2018-06-02

Review 9.  Osteoporosis and treatments in Japan: management for preventing subsequent fractures.

Authors:  Shuko Nojiri; Russel T Burge; Jennifer A Flynn; Shonda A Foster; Hideaki Sowa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 10.  Anabolic treatment for osteoporosis: teriparatide.

Authors:  Richard Eastell; Jennifer S Walsh
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.