Literature DB >> 20580812

Comparison through a LCA evaluation analysis of food waste disposal options from the perspective of global warming and resource recovery.

Mi-Hyung Kim1, Jung-Wk Kim.   

Abstract

This study evaluated feed manufacturing including dry feeding and wet feeding, composting, and landfilling for food waste disposal options from the perspective of global warming and resource recovery. The method of the expanded system boundaries was employed in order to compare different by-products. The whole stages of disposal involved in the systems such as separate discharge, collection, transportation, treatment, and final disposal, were included in the system boundary and evaluated. The Global Warming Potential generated from 1tonne of food wastes for each disposal system was analyzed by the life cycle assessment method. The results showed that 200kg of CO(2)-eq could be produced from dry feeding process, 61kg of CO(2)-eq from wet feeding process, 123kg of CO(2)-eq from composting process, and 1010kg of CO(2)-eq from landfilling. Feed manufacturing and composting, the common treatment methods currently employed, have been known to be environment friendlier than other methods. However, this study shows that they can negatively affect the environment if their by-products are not appropriately utilized as intended. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20580812     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  10 in total

1.  Short-duration hydrothermal fermentation of food waste: preparation of soil conditioner for amending organic-matter-impoverished arable soils.

Authors:  Jiaqi Hou; Mingxiao Li; Beidou Xi; Wenbing Tan; Jie Ding; Yan Hao; Dongming Liu; Hongliang Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  A multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework: development and application in comparing two food waste management options using a UK region as a case study.

Authors:  Eleni Iacovidou; Nikolaos Voulvoulis
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Analyzing Municipal Solid Waste Treatment Scenarios in Rapidly Urbanizing Cities in Developing Countries: The Case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Emmanuel Kazuva; Jiquan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Current scenario of solid waste management techniques and challenges in Covid-19 - A review.

Authors:  J Nimita Jebaranjitham; Jackson Durairaj Selvan Christyraj; Adhimoorthy Prasannan; Kamarajan Rajagopalan; Karthikeyan Subbiahanadar Chelladurai; Jemima Kamalapriya John Samuel Gnanaraja
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-07-02

5.  Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options.

Authors:  Ramy Salemdeeb; Erasmus K H J Zu Ermgassen; Mi Hyung Kim; Andrew Balmford; Abir Al-Tabbaa
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 9.297

6.  Impact of nanoparticle inclusion on bioethanol production process kinetic and inhibitor profile.

Authors:  Isaac A Sanusi; Terence N Suinyuy; Gueguim E B Kana
Journal:  Biotechnol Rep (Amst)       Date:  2021-01-06

7.  Proof of concept for developing novel feeds for cattle from wasted food and crop biomass to enhance agri-food system efficiency.

Authors:  Zhengxia Dou; John D Toth; Dipti W Pitta; Joseph S Bender; Meagan L Hennessy; Bonnie Vecchiarelli; Nagaraju Indugu; Ting Chen; Yunyun Li; Rachel Sherman; Jonathan Deutsch; Bo Hu; Gerald C Shurson; Brianna Parsons; Linda D Baker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Triple Bottom-Line Evaluation of the Production of Animal Feed from Food Waste: A Life Cycle Assessment.

Authors:  Alla Alsaleh; Esra Aleisa
Journal:  Waste Biomass Valorization       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.449

9.  Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there's swill, there's a way.

Authors:  Erasmus K H J Zu Ermgassen; Ben Phalan; Rhys E Green; Andrew Balmford
Journal:  Food Policy       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Food waste management during the COVID-19 outbreak: a holistic climate, economic and nutritional approach.

Authors:  R Aldaco; D Hoehn; J Laso; M Margallo; J Ruiz-Salmón; J Cristobal; R Kahhat; P Villanueva-Rey; A Bala; L Batlle-Bayer; P Fullana-I-Palmer; A Irabien; I Vazquez-Rowe
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 10.753

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.