Literature DB >> 20580692

Central and peripheral components of writing critically depend on a defined area of the dominant superior parietal gyrus.

Lorenzo Magrassi1, Daniele Bongetta, Simonetta Bianchini, Marta Berardesca, Cesare Arienta.   

Abstract

Classical neuropsychological models of writing separate central (linguistic) processes common to oral spelling, writing and typing from peripheral (motor) processes that are modality specific. Damage to the left superior parietal gyrus, an area of the cortex involved in peripheral processes specific to handwriting, should generate distorted graphemes but not misspelled words, while damage to other areas of the cortex like the frontal lobe should produce alterations in written and oral spelling without distorted graphemes. We describe the clinical and neuropsychological features of a patient with combined agraphia for handwriting and typewriting bearing a small glioblastoma in the left parietal lobe. His agraphia resolved after antiedema therapy and we tested by bipolar cortical stimulation his handwriting abilities during an awake neurosurgical procedure. We found that we could reversibly re-induce the same defects of writing by stimulating during surgery a limited area of the superior parietal gyrus in the same patient and in an independent patient that was never agraphic before the operation. In those patients stimulation caused spelling errors, poorly formed letters and in some cases a complete cessation of writing with minimal or no effects on oral spelling. Our results suggest that stimulating a specific area in the superior parietal gyrus we can generate different patterns of agraphia. Moreover, our findings also suggest that some of the central processes specific for typing and handwriting converge with motor processes at least in the limited portion of the superior parietal gyrus we mapped in our patients. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20580692     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  8 in total

Review 1.  Written language production disorders: historical and recent perspectives.

Authors:  Marjorie Lorch
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Evaluating Spelling in Glioma Patients Undergoing Awake Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fleur van Ierschot; Roelien Bastiaanse; Gabriele Miceli
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Dystypia in acute stroke not attributable to aphasia or neglect.

Authors:  Fabian Alexander Blyth Cook; Stephen D J Makin; Joanna Wardlaw; Martin S Dennis
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-09-17

4.  Writing treatment for aphasia: a texting approach.

Authors:  Pélagie M Beeson; Kristina Higginson; Kindle Rising
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Examining the central and peripheral processes of written word production through meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy J Purcell; Peter E Turkeltaub; Guinevere F Eden; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-11

6.  The Neural Basis of Typewriting: A Functional MRI Study.

Authors:  Yuichi Higashiyama; Katsuhiko Takeda; Yoshiaki Someya; Yoshiyuki Kuroiwa; Fumiaki Tanaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Delineating the cognitive-neural substrates of writing: a large scale behavioral and voxel based morphometry study.

Authors:  Haobo Chen; Xiaoping Pan; Wai-Ling Bickerton; Johnny King Lau; Jin Zhou; Beinan Zhou; Lara Harris; Pia Rotshtein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The changed functional status of the brain was involved in patients with poststroke aphasia: Coordinate-based (activation likelihood estimation) meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Du; Yujun Lee; Chuan He; Lihan Peng; Qian Yong; Zhiyi Cen; Yuqin Chen; Xin Liu; Xiaoming Wang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.708

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.