Literature DB >> 20580446

Impact of coronary artery calcium on cardiovascular risk categorization and lipid-lowering drug eligibility in asymptomatic hypercholesterolemic men.

Gilles Chironi1, Alain Simon, Jean-Louis Megnien, Marie-Emmanuelle Sirieix, Elie Mousseaux, Franco Pessana, Ricardo Armentano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Application of coronary artery calcium (CAC) for stratifying coronary heart disease (CHD) risk may change the proportion of subjects eligible for risk reduction treatment and decrease cost-effectiveness of primary prevention. We therefore aimed to analyze the impact of CAC on CHD risk categorization.
METHODS: We measured CAC with electron beam computed tomography in 500 asymptomatic untreated hypercholesterolemic men and re-calibrated 10-year Framingham CHD risk by adding CAC score information (post CAC test risk) via an algorithm integrating relative risk and expected distribution of CAC in the population tested. Proportions of low (<10%), intermediate (10-20%) and high (>20%) risk categories, and of eligibility for lipid-lowering treatment, were compared between Framingham risk and post CAC test risk.
RESULTS: In the overall population, post CAC test risk calculation changed risk categorization defined by Framingham assessment alone, with 10% more low risk and 10% less intermediate risk (p<0.01). Risk reclassifications were bidirectional since 30% of high and 30% of intermediate Framingham risk were downgraded to intermediate and low risk categories respectively, while 11% of low and 14% of intermediate Framingham risk were upgraded to intermediate and high-risk categories respectively. Post CAC test risk did not change the proportion of Framingham-based lipid-lowering treatment eligibility in the overall population but decreased it by 8% in intermediate Framingham risk subgroup (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Addition of CAC to risk prediction resulted rather in downgrading than in upgrading risk and did not change treatment eligibility, except in intermediate risk subjects, less frequently eligible for treatment.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20580446     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.05.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

Review 1.  Primary prevention of coronary heart disease: integration of new data, evolving views, revised goals, and role of rosuvastatin in management. A comprehensive survey.

Authors:  Richard Kones
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.162

2.  An alternative method for quantifying coronary artery calcification: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  C Jason Liang; Matthew J Budoff; Joel D Kaufman; Richard A Kronmal; Elizabeth R Brown
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 3.  Quantitative Vascular Evaluation: From Laboratory Experiments to Point-of-Care Patient (Clinical Approach).

Authors:  Ricardo L Armentano; Leandro J Cymberknop
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rev       Date:  2018

4.  Contribution of intestinal barrier damage, microbial translocation and HIV-1 infection status to an inflammaging signature.

Authors:  Amanda K Steele; Eric J Lee; Brian Vestal; Daniel Hecht; Zachary Dong; Eric Rapaport; John Koeppe; Thomas B Campbell; Cara C Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.