OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the role of occlusion in the development of biomechanical properties of alveolar bone in the miniature pig, Sus scrofa. The hypothesis tested was that the tissues supporting an occluding tooth would show greater stiffness and less strain than that of a non-occluding tooth. DESIGN: Maxillary teeth opposing the erupting lower first molar (M(1)) were extracted on one side. Occlusion developed on the contralateral side. Serially administered fluorochrome labels tracked bone mineralisation apposition rate (MAR). A terminal experiment measured in vivo buccal alveolar bone strain on occluding and non-occluding sides during mastication. Ex vivo alveolar strains during occlusal loading were subsequently measured using a materials testing machine (MTS/Sintech). Whole specimen stiffness and principal strains were calculated. RESULTS: MAR tended to be higher on the extraction side during occlusion. In vivo buccal shear strains were higher in the alveolar bone of the occluding side vs. the extraction side (mean of 471 microvarepsilon vs. 281 microvarepsilon, respectively; p=0.04); however, ex vivo shear strains showed no significant differences between sides. Stiffness differed between extraction and occlusion side specimens, significantly so in the low load range (344 vs. 668 MPa, respectively; p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Greater in vivo shear strains may indicate more forceful chews on the occluding side, whereas the similarity in ex vivo bone strain magnitude suggests a similarity in alveolar bone structure and occlusal load transmission regardless of occlusal status. The big overall change in specimen stiffness that was observed was likely attributable to differences in the periodontal ligament rather than alveolar bone. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the role of occlusion in the development of biomechanical properties of alveolar bone in the miniature pig, Sus scrofa. The hypothesis tested was that the tissues supporting an occluding tooth would show greater stiffness and less strain than that of a non-occluding tooth. DESIGN: Maxillary teeth opposing the erupting lower first molar (M(1)) were extracted on one side. Occlusion developed on the contralateral side. Serially administered fluorochrome labels tracked bone mineralisation apposition rate (MAR). A terminal experiment measured in vivo buccal alveolar bone strain on occluding and non-occluding sides during mastication. Ex vivo alveolar strains during occlusal loading were subsequently measured using a materials testing machine (MTS/Sintech). Whole specimen stiffness and principal strains were calculated. RESULTS: MAR tended to be higher on the extraction side during occlusion. In vivo buccal shear strains were higher in the alveolar bone of the occluding side vs. the extraction side (mean of 471 microvarepsilon vs. 281 microvarepsilon, respectively; p=0.04); however, ex vivo shear strains showed no significant differences between sides. Stiffness differed between extraction and occlusion side specimens, significantly so in the low load range (344 vs. 668 MPa, respectively; p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Greater in vivo shear strains may indicate more forceful chews on the occluding side, whereas the similarity in ex vivo bone strain magnitude suggests a similarity in alveolar bone structure and occlusal load transmission regardless of occlusal status. The big overall change in specimen stiffness that was observed was likely attributable to differences in the periodontal ligament rather than alveolar bone. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: I M Meswania; V A Bousdras; S P Ahir; J L Cunningham; G W Blunn; A E Goodship Journal: Proc Inst Mech Eng H Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 1.617
Authors: V A Bousdras; J L Cunningham; M Ferguson-Pell; M A Bamber; S Sindet-Pedersen; G Blunn; A E Goodship Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Sean Holliday; Bernard Schneider; Maria Therese Galang; Tadayoshi Fukui; Akira Yamane; Xianghong Luan; Thomas G H Diekwisch Journal: World J Orthod Date: 2005