Literature DB >> 20580268

Subjective reports of stimulus, response, and decision times in speeded tasks: how accurate are decision time reports?

Jeff Miller1, Paula Vieweg, Nicolas Kruize, Belinda McLea.   

Abstract

Four experiments examined how accurately participants can report the times of their own decisions. Within an auditory reaction time (RT) task, participants reported the time at which (a) the tone was presented, (b) they decided on the response, or (c) the response key was pressed. Decision time reports were checked for plausibility against the actual RTs, and we compared the effects of experimental manipulations on these two measures to see whether the reported decision times showed appropriate effects. In addition, we estimated the amount of error associated with individual decision time reports by checking how often participants' decision time reports were implausibly early (i.e., before stimulus onset) or late (i.e., after response), and by using several quantitative models. Overall, the results suggest that decision time reports are not very accurate but they may be usable for some purposes.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20580268     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  3 in total

Review 1.  The implicit sense of agency is not a perceptual effect but is a judgment effect.

Authors:  Nagireddy Neelakanteswar Reddy
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-11-09

2.  Piercing of Consciousness as a Threshold-Crossing Operation.

Authors:  Yul H R Kang; Frederike H Petzschner; Daniel M Wolpert; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Mind wandering at the fingertips: automatic parsing of subjective states based on response time variability.

Authors:  Mikaël Bastian; Jérôme Sackur
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.