Literature DB >> 20580261

Balancing rejection and infection with respect to age, race, and gender: clues acquired from 17 years of cardiac transplantation data.

James F George1, Salpy V Pamboukian, José A Tallaj, David C Naftel, Susan L Myers, Margaret T Foushee, Robert N Brown, Octavio E Pajaro, David C McGiffin, James K Kirklin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Donor and recipient risk factors for rejection and infection have been well characterized. The contribution of demographic factors, especially age at the time of transplantation to morbidity and mortality due to rejection and infection, is much less well understood.
METHODS: Using parametric hazard analysis and multivariate risk-factor equations for infection and rejection events, we quantitatively determined the relationship of fundamental demographic variables (age, race and gender) to infection and rejection. These analyses were conducted with respect to date of transplant and age at the time of transplantation. The patient group consisted of all primary heart transplants performed at the University of Alabama at Birmingham during the years 1990 to 2007 (n = 526).
RESULTS: Risk factors for rejection within 12 months post-transplantation were date of transplant (p < 0.0001) and age at the time of transplantation (young adults 10 to 30 years of age, p < 0.0001). Risk factors for infection were date of transplant (p < 0.0001) and age at the time of transplantation (young children and older adults, p < 0.0001). There were three immunosuppressive eras in 1990 to 2007. Notably, although the proportion of patients experiencing rejection and infection events decreased during each successive immunosuppressive era, the relative relationship of infection to rejection, as well as age at the time of transplantation, remained similar into the most recent era. The maximal frequency of rejection events and rejection death occurred among patients transplanted at ages 10 to 30 years. Conversely, the frequency of infection events was minimal within the same group. In the oldest and youngest patients receiving transplants, infection was the predominant cause of death and rates of rejection events decreased.
CONCLUSIONS: These data show that evolving immunosuppressive strategies have successfully reduced rejection and infection frequencies, and those patients transplanted at 30 to 60 years of age have the lowest frequency of rejection/infection events. However, individuals transplanted at younger or older ages, especially non-white recipients in the 10- to 30-year age group, experience significantly more infection or rejection. Therefore, programs should increase the level of surveillance in these patients and consider modification of immunosuppressive regimens in order to lower the frequency of infection and rejection events. Copyright 2010 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20580261     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  8 in total

1.  Mortality, rehospitalization, and post-transplant complications in gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Anne Jalowiec; Kathleen L Grady; Connie White-Williams
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.210

2.  Impact of Insurance Type on Initial Rejection Post Heart Transplant.

Authors:  Khadijah Breathett; Shannon Willis; Randi E Foraker; Sakima Smith
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.975

3.  First-year clinical outcomes in gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Anne Jalowiec; Kathleen L Grady; Connie White-Williams
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Patients With Heart Failure From Before to Early After Advanced Surgical Therapies: Findings From the SUSTAIN-IT Study.

Authors:  Kathleen L Grady; Andrew Kao; John A Spertus; Eileen Hsich; Mary Amanda Dew; Duc-Thinh Pham; Justin Hartupee; Michael Petty; William Cotts; Salpy V Pamboukian; Francis D Pagani; Brent Lampert; Maryl Johnson; Margaret Murray; Koji Takeda; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Scott Silvestry; James K Kirklin; Adin-Cristian Andrei; Christian Elenbaas; Abigail Baldridge; Clyde Yancy
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 10.447

5.  Better Understanding the Disparity Associated With Black Race in Heart Transplant Outcomes: A National Registry Analysis.

Authors:  Hasina Maredia; Mary Grace Bowring; Allan B Massie; Sunjae Bae; Amber Kernodle; Shakirat Oyetunji; Christian Merlo; Robert S D Higgins; Dorry L Segev; Errol L Bush
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 8.790

6.  Human Leukocyte Antigen-Based Risk Stratification in Heart Transplant Recipients-Implications for Targeted Surveillance.

Authors:  Johan Nilsson; David Ansari; Mattias Ohlsson; Peter Höglund; Ann-Sofie Liedberg; J Gustav Smith; Pierre Nugues; Bodil Andersson
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Twenty-Year Experience of Heart Transplantation: Early and Long-Term Results.

Authors:  Jae-Hong Lee; Sang Yoon Yeom; Ho Young Hwang; Jae-Woong Choi; Hyun-Jai Cho; Hae-Young Lee; Jae-Hak Huh; Ki-Bong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-05

8.  Utility of routine evaluations for rejection in patients greater than 2 years after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Jessica R Golbus; Matthew C Konerman; Keith D Aaronson
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-06-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.