Literature DB >> 20580142

Ethical challenges in the provision of end-of-life care in Norwegian nursing homes.

Elisabeth Gjerberg1, Reidun Førde, Reidar Pedersen, Georg Bollig.   

Abstract

As in other Western countries, most Norwegian nursing home patients are suffering from multi-pathological conditions and a large majority of them will die in the nursing home. End-of-life care represents many challenges, and it is a widespread concern that several nursing homes lack both resources and competence to ensure good quality care. This article examines the types and prevalence of ethical challenges in end-of-life care as nursing home staff consider them, as well as what they believe can help them to better cope with the ethical challenges. It is based on a national survey probing Norwegian nursing homes' end-of-life care at the ward level conducted in 2007. 664 respondents from 364 nursing homes answered the questionnaire, representing 68% of the patients and 76% of the nursing home sample. Inadequate care due to lack of resources and breaches of the patient's autonomy and integrity were the ethical challenges reported most often. Conflicts with the next of kin regarding nursing care and termination of life-prolonging treatment were reported more seldom. However, when asking the respondents to outline one of the most recent ethical dilemmas they had encountered, the majority of the respondents described ethical dilemmas concerning limitation of life-prolonging treatment, often mixed with disagreements between the wish of the family and that of the patient, or between the wish of the next of kin and what the staff consider to be right. Ethical dilemmas associated with breaches of the patient's autonomy and integrity were also thoroughly described. According to the staff, better ethical knowledge along with more time to reflect on ethical dilemmas were the initiatives most desired to improve the staff's way of handling ethical challenges. Furthermore, to have an opportunity to consult with a person holding ethical competence was emphasised by more than half of the respondents. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20580142     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  14 in total

1.  Nurses' responses to initial moral distress in long-term care.

Authors:  Marie P Edwards; Susan E McClement; Laurie R Read
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Ethical issues in communication of diagnosis and end-of-life decision-making process in some of the Romanian Roma communities.

Authors:  Gabriel Roman; Angela Enache; Andrada Pârvu; Rodica Gramma; Ştefana Maria Moisa; Silvia Dumitraş; Beatrice Ioan
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-08

3.  Ethical challenges in home mechanical ventilation: a secondary analysis.

Authors:  Knut Dybwik; Erik Waage Nielsen; Berit Støre Brinchmann
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 2.874

4.  Ethics reflection groups in community health services: an evaluation study.

Authors:  Lillian Lillemoen; Reidar Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Dealing with ethical challenges: a focus group study with professionals in mental health care.

Authors:  Bert Molewijk; Marit Helene Hem; Reidar Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Normalizing suffering: A meta-synthesis of experiences of and perspectives on pain and pain management in nursing homes.

Authors:  Mojtaba Vaismoradi; Lisa Skär; Siv Söderberg; Terese E Bondas
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2016-05-11

7.  They know!-Do they? A qualitative study of residents and relatives views on advance care planning, end-of-life care, and decision-making in nursing homes.

Authors:  Georg Bollig; Eva Gjengedal; Jan Henrik Rosland
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 8.  A review of the implementation and research strategies of advance care planning in nursing homes.

Authors:  E Flo; B S Husebo; P Bruusgaard; E Gjerberg; L Thoresen; L Lillemoen; R Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  The Norwegian national project for ethics support in community health and care services.

Authors:  Morten Magelssen; Elisabeth Gjerberg; Reidar Pedersen; Reidun Førde; Lillian Lillemoen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Nothing to complain about? Residents' and relatives' views on a "good life" and ethical challenges in nursing homes.

Authors:  Georg Bollig; Eva Gjengedal; Jan Henrik Rosland
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 2.874

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.