Literature DB >> 20579798

Emotional valence and arousal effects on memory and hemispheric asymmetries.

Malek Mneimne1, Alice S Powers, Kate E Walton, David S Kosson, Samantha Fonda, Jessica Simonetti.   

Abstract

This study examined predictions based upon the right hemisphere (RH) model, the valence-arousal model, and a recently proposed integrated model (Killgore & Yurgelun-Todd, 2007) of emotion processing by testing immediate recall and recognition memory for positive, negative, and neutral verbal stimuli among 35 right-handed women. Building upon methodologies of previous studies, we found that words presented to the right visual field/left hemisphere (RVF/LH) were recalled and recognized more accurately than words presented to the left visual field/right hemisphere (LVF/RH), and we found significant valence by visual field interactions. Some findings were consistent with one of the models evaluated whereas others were consistent with none of the models evaluated. Our findings suggest that an integration of the RH and valence-arousal models may best account for the findings with regard to hemispheric lateralization of memory for emotional stimuli. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20579798     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  8 in total

1.  Predictive value and reward in implicit classification learning.

Authors:  Judith M Lam; Tobias Wächter; Christoph Globas; Hans-Otto Karnath; Andreas R Luft
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  NEVER forget: negative emotional valence enhances recapitulation.

Authors:  Holly J Bowen; Sarah M Kark; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

3.  Mood modulates auditory laterality of hemodynamic mismatch responses during dichotic listening.

Authors:  Lisa Schock; Miriam Dyck; Liliana R Demenescu; J Christopher Edgar; Ingo Hertrich; Walter Sturm; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Negative target stimuli do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction.

Authors:  Saskia Kaiser; Axel Buchner; Laura Mieth; Raoul Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Reference valence effects of affective s-R compatibility: are visual and auditory results consistent?

Authors:  Zhao Xiaojun; You Xuqun; Shi Changxiu; Gan Shuoqiu; Hu Chaoyi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dissociable self effects for emotion regulation: a study of Chinese major depressive outpatients.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Wang; Zhengzhi Feng; Daiquan Zhou; Xu Lei; Tongquan Liao; Li Zhang; Bing Ji; Jing Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Inter and intra-hemispheric structural imaging markers predict depression relapse after electroconvulsive therapy: a multisite study.

Authors:  Benjamin S C Wade; Jing Sui; Gerhard Hellemann; Amber M Leaver; Randall T Espinoza; Roger P Woods; Christopher C Abbott; Shantanu H Joshi; Katherine L Narr
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 7.989

8.  Verbal emotional memory laterality effect on amygdalohippocampectomy for refractory epilepsy.

Authors:  Fernando Carvajal; Ainara Calahorra-Romillo; Sandra Rubio; Pilar Martín
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.708

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.